CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
    • CIAT Articles in Journals
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
    • CIAT Articles in Journals
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Synergistic impacts of agricultural credit and extension on adoption of climate-smart agricultural technologies in southern Africa

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Author's version (1.078Mb)
    Authors
    Makate, Clifton
    Makate, Marshall
    Mutenje, Munyaradzi
    Mango, Nelson
    Siziba, Shephard
    Date Issued
    2019-12
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    Copyrighted; all rights reserved
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Makate, Clifton; Makate, Marshall; Mutenje, Munyaradzi; Mango, Nelson & Siziba, Shephard (2019). Synergistic impacts of agricultural credit and extension on adoption of climate-smart agricultural technologies in southern Africa. Environmental Development. 32:100458
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/103964
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.100458
    Abstract/Description
    Institutional credit and extension services are critical inputs that can reduce scaling challenges in agricultural development interventions if accessed by farmers. Using household level survey data from Zimbabwe and Malawi, this article seeks to contribute to the existing literature by examining impacts of separate and joint access to credit and extension services on climate-smart agricultural (CSA) technologies adoption. Using inverse-probability weighting regression adjustment and propensity score matching this study found out that access to either extension or credit significantly progresses CSA technology adoption. However, access to extension services only proved to be more effective in enhancing CSA technology adoption than access to credit alone. More importantly, results show enhanced collective impact of simultaneous access to credit and extension on CSA technology adoption. Further, joint impacts of credit and extension on adoption were found to be less pronounced in youthful and women farmer groups compared to their old and male farmer group counterparts respectively. Results call for prudent policy and institutional strategies in improving access to credit and extension services in Malawian and Zimbabwean smallholder farming that are mindful of disadvantaged groups such as youth and women farmer groups in order to improve adoption and upscaling of CSA technologies. Possible options include; improving number of extension workers at village level, increasing youth and women extension agent numbers, capacity building of extension personnel and institutions, and increasing financial support to national extension programs.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Clifton Makatehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6061-6638
    Marshall Makatehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-2970
    Munyaradzi Junia Mutenjehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7829-9300
    Nelson Mangohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4436-0449
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
    AGROVOC Keywords
    climate-smart agriculture; agricultura climáticamente inteligente; gender
    Countries
    Malawi; Zimbabwe
    Regions
    Africa; Southern Africa; Eastern Africa
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    International Center for Tropical Agriculture
    Collections
    • CIAT Articles in Journals [2636]
    • CIAT Decision and Policy Analysis - DAPA [620]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback