Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Brooke A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGrantham, Hedley S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWatson, James E.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez, Silvia J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSimmonds, Jeremy S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRogéliz, Carlos A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Mayesse A. daen_US
dc.contributor.authorForero-Medina, Germánen_US
dc.contributor.authorEtter, Andrésen_US
dc.contributor.authorNogales, Jonathanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWalschburger, Tomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorHyman, Glenn G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBeyer, Hawthorne L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-29T15:49:56Zen_US
dc.date.available2020-01-29T15:49:56Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/106802en_US
dc.titleMinimising the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in an intact landscape under risk of rapid agricultural developmenten_US
cg.subject.ciatBIODIVERSITYen_US
cg.subject.ciatECOSYSTEM SERVICESen_US
dcterms.abstractAs humanity's demand for resources continues to rise and productive arable lands become increasingly scarce, many of Earth's remaining intact regions are at heightened risk of destruction from agricultural development. In situations where agricultural expansion is inevitable, it is important to manage intact landscape transformation so that impacts on environmental values are minimised. Here, we present a novel, spatially explicit, land use planning framework that addresses the decision making needed to account for different, competing economic-environment objectives (agricultural production value, biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service retention) when land use change is inevitable within an intact landscape. We apply our framework to the globally significant savannahs of the Orinoquia (Colombia), which in a post-conflict era is under increased agricultural development pressure. We show that while negative environmental impacts can be reduced through planning, the total area of land converted to agriculture is the unavoidable principal driver of biodiversity and ecosystem service loss. We therefore identify planning solutions that perform well across all objectives simultaneously, despite trade-offs among them. When 15%, 20%, 30% and 40% of the study area is allowed to be converted to agriculture, on average planning can improve species persistence and ecosystem service retention by up to 16%, 15%, 12%, and 9%, respectively, when compared to agricultural-focused solutions. Development in the region so far has had an unnecessarily large impact on environmental objectives due to a lack of effective land use planning, creating an 'opportunity debt'. Our study provides an evidence base to inform proactive planning and the development of environmentally sensible agricultural development policy and practice in the region. This framework can be used by stakeholders to achieve agriculture expansion goals and maximise economic profit while minimising impacts on the environment in the Orinoquia, or any relatively intact region that is being developed.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.available2020-01-07en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWilliams, B.A.; Grantham, H.S.; Watson, J.E.M.; Alvarez, S.J.; Simmonds, J.; Rogeliz, C.; da Silva, M.; Forero-Medina, G.; Etter, A.; Nogales, J.; Walschburger, T.; Hyman, G.; Beyer, H. (2020) Minimising the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in an intact landscape under risk of rapid agricultural development. Environmental Research Letters 15: 014001 14 p. ISSN: 1748-9326en_US
dcterms.extent15: 014001en_US
dcterms.issued2020-01-01en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherIOP Publishingen_US
dcterms.subjectland useen_US
dcterms.subjectutilización de la tierraen_US
dcterms.subjectconservationen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dcterms.subjectservicios de los ecosistemasen_US
dcterms.subjectbiodiversityen_US
dcterms.subjectbiodiversidaden_US
dcterms.subjectagricultural developmenten_US
dcterms.subjectdesarrollo agrícolaen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationAlliance of Bioversity International and CIATen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Queenslanden_US
cg.contributor.affiliationWildlife Conservation Societyen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationNature Conservancyen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationPontificia Universidad Javerianaen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ff7en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.creator.identifierBrooke Williams: 0000-0002-0692-7507en_US
cg.creator.identifierJames Watson: 0000-0003-4942-1984en_US
cg.creator.identifierJeremy Simmonds: 0000-0002-1662-5908en_US
cg.creator.identifierMAYESSE DA SILVA: 0000-0002-3734-9586en_US
cg.creator.identifierAndres Etter: 0000-0003-0665-9300en_US
cg.creator.identifierGlenn Hyman: 0000-0002-0406-1201en_US
cg.creator.identifierHawthorne Beyer: 0000-0002-5430-0784en_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalEnvironmental Research Lettersen_US
cg.issn1748-9326en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record