Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMungai, L.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSnapp, Sieglinde S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMessina, J.P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChikowo, Regisen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAnders, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, R.B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-11T11:39:07Zen_US
dc.date.available2020-02-11T11:39:07Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/107028en_US
dc.titleSmallholder farms and the potential for sustainable intensificationen_US
cg.authorship.typesNot CGIAR developing country instituteen_US
cg.authorship.typesNot CGIAR international instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaMAIZEen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT ECOLOGYen_US
dcterms.abstractThe sustainable intensification of African agriculture is gaining momentum with the compelling need to increase food and agricultural production. In Southern Africa, smallholder farming systems are predominately maize-based and subject to erratic climatic conditions. Farmer crop and soil management decisions are influenced by a plethora of complex factors such as market access resource availability, social relations, environment, and various messages on sustainable farming practices. Such factors pose barriers to increasing sustainable intensification in Africa. This paper characterizes smallholder farming practices in Central Malawi, at Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation (Africa RISING) project sites. We present findings from a survey of 324 farmers, located within four Africa RISING sites selected in a stratified random manner to represent (1) low agricultural potential (high evapotranspiration, variable rainfall), (2) medium agricultural potential (two sites), and (3) high agricultural potential (well-distributed rainfall). Soil fertility was low overall, and certain farming practices appeared to limit the sustainability of agricultural production. Nearly half of farmers did not value legume residues as a high nutrient value resource for soil amelioration, as legume residues were removed (17.9%) or burned (21.4%). Conversely, maize residues were rarely removed (4.5%) or burned (10.4%). We found that farmers do not allocate soil amendment resources to legume fields (zero instances of mineral fertilizer or manure application to legumes compared to 88 and 22% of maize systems, respectively). Policy makers in Malawi have led initiatives to intensify agricultural systems through subsidizing farmer access to mineral fertilizer as well as maize hybrid seed, and only rarely to improved legume seed. In this survey, farmers allocate mineral fertilizer to maize systems and not legume systems. There is urgent need to invest in education on sustainable reinvestment in natural resources through complementary practices, such as maximization of biological nitrogen fixation through improved legume agronomy and better organic resource and crop residue management. Recent efforts by Malawi agricultural services to promote doubled-up legumes as a sustainable intensification technology are encouraging, but benefits will not accrue unless equal attention is given to an extension campaign on management of organic resources such as crop residues.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMungai, L.M., Snapp, S., Messina, J.P., Chikowo, R., Smith, A., Anders, E., Richardson, R.B. and Li, G. 2016. Smallholder farms and the potential for sustainable intensification. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1720.en_US
dcterms.issued2016-11-17en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dcterms.subjectfarming systemsen_US
dcterms.subjectintensificationen_US
dcterms.subjectanimal feedingen_US
dcterms.subjectmixed farmingen_US
dcterms.subjectlivestocken_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.subject.ilriANIMAL FEEDINGen_US
cg.subject.ilriCROP-LIVESTOCKen_US
cg.subject.ilriFARMING SYSTEMSen_US
cg.subject.ilriINTENSIFICATIONen_US
cg.subject.ilriLIVESTOCKen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationMichigan State Universityen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zimbabween_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01720en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryMalawien_US
cg.contributor.crpMaizeen_US
cg.identifier.iitathemePLANT PRODUCTION & HEALTHen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MWen_US
cg.contributor.donorUnited States Agency for International Developmenten_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalFrontiers in Plant Scienceen_US
cg.issn1664-462Xen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record