CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)
    • IITA Journal Articles
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)
    • IITA Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Assessment of the suitability of different cassava varieties for gari and fufu flour production in Liberia

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Journal Article (377.8Kb)
    Authors
    Awoyale, W.
    Asiedu, R.
    Kawalawu, W.K.
    Abass, A.
    Maziya-Dixon, B.
    Kromah, A.
    Edet, M.
    Mulbah, S.
    Date Issued
    2020
    Date Online
    2020-02
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Awoyale, W., Asiedu, R., Kawalawu, W.K., Abass, A., Maziya-Dixon, B., Kromah, A., ... & Mulbah, S. (2020). Assessment of the suitability of different cassava varieties for gari and fufu flour production in Liberia. Asian Food Science Journal, 36-52.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/107398
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/afsj/2020/v14i230128
    Abstract/Description
    Different cassava varieties are available in Liberia, but there is little knowledge of their product suitability. Hence, the need to assess the potentials of these varieties to produce gari and fufu flour. The two products from ten improved and two local cassava varieties were characterized based on their yield and chemical, pasting and functional properties using standard methods. The results showed that TMS 96/0097 (gari 27.54%) and Butter cassava (fufu flour 27.35%) have the highest percentage yields. The starch content was higher in gari produced from TMS98/0505 (92.00%) and lower from TMS95/0289 (82.62%); the fufu flour starch content was higher in TMS98/0505 (90.59%) and lower in Bassa girl (84.75%). Gari and fufu flour produced from TMS96/0097 (507.38 RUV) and TMS00/0357 (506.04 RVU) had the highest final viscosity, and the products from TMS95/0289 (338.46 RVU and 336.80 RVU) had the least. The highest swelling power was found in gari (12.74%) and fufu flour (13.55%) produced from TMS92/0057 and the lowest in TMS91/0416 gari (8.23%) and TMS01/1235 fufu flour (8.31%). All the samples may form a paste below the boiling point of water (100°C) at < 7 min. However, cassava varieties and the interactions between varieties and locations had a significant (P < 0.05) effect on the properties of the products: Chemical (except ash content), pasting (except pasting temperature) and functional. Therefore, all the varieties may be suitable for gari and fufu flour production based on the quality preferred by the consumers.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Wasiu Awoyalehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-1414
    Robert Asieduhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8943-2376
    Adebayo Abasshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1376-3608
    Busie Maziya-Dixonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-2201
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Roots, Tubers and Bananas
    AGROVOC Keywords
    cassava; varieties; garri; chemicophysical properties
    Subjects
    AGRIBUSINESS; AGRONOMY; CASSAVA; FOOD SECURITY; FOOD SYSTEMS; LIVELIHOODS; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT HEALTH; PLANT PRODUCTION; VALUE CHAINS
    Countries
    Liberia
    Regions
    Africa; Western Africa
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    International Institute of Tropical Agriculture; Kwara State University; University of Liberia; Central Agricultural Research Institute, Liberia
    Investors/sponsors
    World Bank; African Development Bank
    Collections
    • IITA Journal Articles [4998]
    • RTB Journal Articles [1344]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback