CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • CGIAR Research Programs and Platforms (2012-2021)
    • CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE)
    • WLE Phase II Research Themes
    • Rural-Urban Linkages
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • CGIAR Research Programs and Platforms (2012-2021)
    • CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE)
    • WLE Phase II Research Themes
    • Rural-Urban Linkages
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Why adoption is slow despite promising potential of biogas technology for improving energy security and mitigating climate change in Sri Lanka?

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Bekchanov, Maksud
    Mondal, M.
    Hossain A.
    Alwis, A. de
    Mirzabaev, A.
    Date Issued
    2019-05
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Usage rights
    Copyrighted; all rights reserved
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Bekchanov, M.; Mondal, Md. A. H.; de Alwis, A.; Mirzabaev, A. 2019. Why adoption is slow despite promising potential of biogas technology for improving energy security and mitigating climate change in Sri Lanka?.Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 105:378-390pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.010
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/108341
    External link to download this item: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032119301030?via%3Dihub
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.010
    Abstract/Description
    Despite multiple economic, environmental and health benefits of biogas and governmental support to scale up biogas technologies, the rate of biogas adoption has been slow in many developing countries. Although technical barriers in biogas technologies have been mostly addressed, there are persisting gaps in knowledge about the role of administrative (regulatory) and market-based policy instruments in the waste-to-energy value chain for facilitating biogas adoption. Therefore, using the case of Sri Lanka, this study investigates policy instruments along the waste-to-energy value chain that affect biogas technology adoption. Additionally, a consistent analytical framework is developed for simultaneously assessing technical and economic potentials as well as environmental impacts of biogas adoption at large scales. Quantitative assessments are complemented with qualitative assessments including key expert interviews. The findings indicate that biogas energy potential from organic waste recycling is 29–42 PJ which accounts for 16–23% of the household energy demand. Biogas technology adoptions also offset 3.9–4.8 million tons of CO2 equivalent gases (or 8.6− 10.8% of nationwide GHG emissions). Despite considerable technical potential and positive environmental externalities, biogas adoptions in Sri Lanka are mainly occurring through administrative enforcement rather than market-based incentives. The ways and impacts of introducing market-based instruments to increase the investment attractiveness of the biogas technology are discussed.
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Water, Land and Ecosystems
    AGROVOC Keywords
    potential biogas recovery; waste management; environmental impact; ghg emissions; market-based policy instruments
    Subjects
    CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY; POLICY; RECOVERING AND REUSING RESOURCES; RESOURCE UTILIZATION
    Countries
    Sri Lanka
    Regions
    Southern Asia
    Collections
    • Rural-Urban Linkages [179]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback