Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBekchanov, Maksuden_US
dc.contributor.authorMondal, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHossain A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlwis, A. deen_US
dc.contributor.authorMirzabaev, A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-27T15:22:59Zen_US
dc.date.available2020-05-27T15:22:59Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/108341en_US
dc.titleWhy adoption is slow despite promising potential of biogas technology for improving energy security and mitigating climate change in Sri Lanka?en_US
cg.subject.wleCLIMATE CHANGEen_US
cg.subject.wleENERGYen_US
cg.subject.wlePOLICYen_US
cg.subject.wleRECOVERING AND REUSING RESOURCESen_US
cg.subject.wleRESOURCE UTILIZATIONen_US
dcterms.abstractDespite multiple economic, environmental and health benefits of biogas and governmental support to scale up biogas technologies, the rate of biogas adoption has been slow in many developing countries. Although technical barriers in biogas technologies have been mostly addressed, there are persisting gaps in knowledge about the role of administrative (regulatory) and market-based policy instruments in the waste-to-energy value chain for facilitating biogas adoption. Therefore, using the case of Sri Lanka, this study investigates policy instruments along the waste-to-energy value chain that affect biogas technology adoption. Additionally, a consistent analytical framework is developed for simultaneously assessing technical and economic potentials as well as environmental impacts of biogas adoption at large scales. Quantitative assessments are complemented with qualitative assessments including key expert interviews. The findings indicate that biogas energy potential from organic waste recycling is 29–42 PJ which accounts for 16–23% of the household energy demand. Biogas technology adoptions also offset 3.9–4.8 million tons of CO2 equivalent gases (or 8.6− 10.8% of nationwide GHG emissions). Despite considerable technical potential and positive environmental externalities, biogas adoptions in Sri Lanka are mainly occurring through administrative enforcement rather than market-based incentives. The ways and impacts of introducing market-based instruments to increase the investment attractiveness of the biogas technology are discussed.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBekchanov, M.; Mondal, Md. A. H.; de Alwis, A.; Mirzabaev, A. 2019. Why adoption is slow despite promising potential of biogas technology for improving energy security and mitigating climate change in Sri Lanka?.Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 105:378-390pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.010en_US
dcterms.extent105:378-390pp.en_US
dcterms.issued2019-05en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dcterms.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dcterms.subjectpotential biogas recoveryen_US
dcterms.subjectwaste managementen_US
dcterms.subjectenvironmental impacten_US
dcterms.subjectghg emissionsen_US
dcterms.subjectmarket-based policy instrumentsen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032119301030?via%3Dihuben_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.010en_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countrySri Lankaen_US
cg.contributor.crpWater, Land and Ecosystemsen_US
cg.identifier.wlethemeRural-Urban Linkagesen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2LKen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewsen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record