Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNabahungu, N.L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCyamweshi, A.R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKayumba, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKokou, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMukuralinda, Athanaseen_US
dc.contributor.authorCirhuza, J.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWortmann, C.S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-17T13:23:30Zen_US
dc.date.available2020-07-17T13:23:30Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/108806en_US
dc.titleLowland rice yield and profit response to fertilizer application in Rwandaen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaNATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENTen_US
dcterms.abstractRice (Oryza sativa ) production in Rwanda increased by 70% while yield ha−1 decreased during the past decade. Yield has biotic and abiotic constraints including inadequate nutrient supply. Yield response functions for N, P, and K were determined in eight marshlands grouped into four clusters. Additional treatment allowed for the diagnosis of response to Mg–S–Zn–B (MgSZnB). Rice grain yield with no fertilizer applied was 2.27 Mg ha−1. Mean yield increases were 2.35, 1.53, and 1.71 Mg ha−1 with N, P, and K application, respectively. The mean economically optimal rates (EOR) were 58 to >150, 11–30, and 21–35 kg ha−1 for N, P, and K, respectively, depending on cluster and the cost of fertilizer. Yield responses to nutrient rates were similar across marshland clusters, and a single response function for each of P and K can serve all four clusters, while the response to N differed for Cluster B compared with A, BC, and C. Net returns to applied P and K were greater than for N, but the application of N is likely needed for such responses to P and K. The MgSZnB resulted in a mean grain yield increase of 1.72 Mg ha−1 with increases in all marshlands, but the information was not sufficient to determine which nutrients of MgSZnB were deficient or their optimal application rates. Fertilizer use can be very profitable for rice production in Rwanda. Profit can be enhanced with the application at less than EOR when fertilizer use is financially constrained.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.available2019-12-10en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNabahungu, N.L., Cyamweshi, A.R., Kayumba, J., Kokou, K., Mukuralinda, A., Cirhuza, J.M. & Wortmann, C.S. (2020). Lowland rice yield and profit response to fertilizer application in Rwanda. Agronomy Journal, 112(2), 1423-1432.en_US
dcterms.extent1-10en_US
dcterms.issued2020-03en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dcterms.publisherWileyen_US
dcterms.subjectoryza sativaen_US
dcterms.subjectrwandaen_US
dcterms.subjectyieldsen_US
dcterms.subjectprofiten_US
dcterms.subjectcostsen_US
dcterms.subjectfertilizer applicationen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationRwanda Agriculture Boarden_US
cg.contributor.affiliationWorld Agroforestry Centreen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nebraskaen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20006en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionMiddle Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryRwandaen_US
cg.contributor.crpRiceen_US
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananasen_US
cg.identifier.iitathemeNATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENTen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2RWen_US
cg.creator.identifierNsharwasi Nabahungu: 0000-0002-2104-3777en_US
cg.contributor.donorBill & Melinda Gates Foundationen_US
cg.contributor.donorAlliance for a Green Revolution in Africaen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalAgronomy Journalen_US
cg.issn0002-1962en_US
cg.volume112en_US
cg.issue2en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record