Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSharma, Akritien_US
dc.contributor.authorKarki, Emmaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEriyagama, Nishadien_US
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Gittaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeuland, Marcen_US
dc.contributor.authorBharati, Lunaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T14:08:15Zen_US
dc.date.available2020-10-15T14:08:15Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/109856en_US
dc.titleWhose river is it?: an assessment of livelihood and cultural water flow requirements for the Karnali Basinen_US
dcterms.abstractThe term “environmental flows” refers to a combination of features, including quantity, quality, and timing of water flows required to sustainably maintain a river’s health, balancing both ecological and societal needs. Incorporating basic human livelihood and sociocultural aspects in environmental flow assessments alongside ecological concerns provides a more holistic perspective on water flow management. Here, we provide an assessment that complements an ecosystem functioning lens by focusing solely on quantifying the flows associated with livelihood activities and spiritual water requirements of local riparian communities in the Karnali basin in Western Nepal. This assessment is based on the first social survey related to environmental flows conducted in the Karnali basin. We collected data using mixed methods, including social surveys, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions, across six locations in the Karnali basin that provide us with a rich and dynamic perspective on the relationship between rivers and their surrounding communities, and the challenges faced by those communities. Among the subsistence and spiritual requirements of local communities are uses for activities that include drinking, small-scale irrigation, domestic needs, fishing, and ceremonial usage. All communities we visited most strongly associated the following activities with water flow variation: small-scale irrigation, fishing, ceremonial usage, domestic needs, and tourism. The water flows required for these key activities were quantified, and results from the six sites are presented in the form of a qualitative scale of minimum water levels (ranging across poor, acceptable, and ideal) required to meet vital local needs. The minimum acceptable water flow requirement to satisfy social criteria is just > 20% of the mean annual runoff at the visited locations. These requirements are particularly vital to consider, given ongoing efforts to tap the vast hydropower potential in Nepal through construction of major storage projects. Such projects would change the flow regime of affected rivers and potentially raise concerns that existing demands might be compromised.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.available2020en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSharma, Akriti; Karki, Emma; Eriyagama, Nishadi; Shrestha, Gitta; Jeuland, M.; Bharati, Luna. 2020. Whose river is it?: an assessment of livelihood and cultural water flow requirements for the Karnali Basin. Ecology and Society, 25(3):22. [doi: 10.5751/ES-11763-250322] https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss3/art22/ES-2020-11763.pdfen_US
dcterms.extent22en_US
dcterms.issued2020-10-01en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherResilience Alliance, Inc.en_US
dcterms.subjectenvironmental flowsen_US
dcterms.subjectriver basinsen_US
dcterms.subjectlivelihoodsen_US
dcterms.subjectsociocultural environmenten_US
dcterms.subjectwater managementen_US
dcterms.subjectflow dischargeen_US
dcterms.subjectwater levelsen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystemsen_US
dcterms.subjectbiodiversityen_US
dcterms.subjectwater pollutionen_US
dcterms.subjectwater useen_US
dcterms.subjectfisheriesen_US
dcterms.subjectirrigationen_US
dcterms.subjecthousehold consumptionen_US
dcterms.subjecttourismen_US
dcterms.subjectriparian zonesen_US
dcterms.subjectlocal communitiesen_US
dcterms.subjectwomenen_US
dcterms.subjectsustainable developmenten_US
dcterms.subjectsocioeconomic aspectsen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Water Management Instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationDuke Universityen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11763-250322en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.identifier.iwmilibraryH050015en_US
cg.creator.identifierLuna Bharati: 0000-0002-6218-3282en_US
cg.creator.identifierNishadi Eriyagama: 0000-0002-4493-5284en_US
cg.creator.identifierGitta Shrestha: 0000-0002-2428-0954en_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalEcology and Societyen_US
cg.issn1708-3087en_US
cg.volume25en_US
cg.issue3en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record