Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeesigamukama, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMochoge, B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKorir, N.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFiaboe, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNakimbugwe, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKhamis, F.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSubramanian, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDubois, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMusyoka, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEkesi, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKelemu, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTanga, C.M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-19T12:41:00Zen_US
dc.date.available2020-11-19T12:41:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/110239en_US
dc.titleExploring black soldier fly frass as novel fertilizer for improved growth, yield, and nitrogen use efficiency of maize under field conditionsen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaAGRONOMYen_US
cg.subject.iitaMAIZEen_US
cg.subject.iitaNATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENTen_US
cg.subject.iitaPESTS OF PLANTSen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT BREEDINGen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT HEALTHen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT PRODUCTIONen_US
dcterms.abstractBlack soldier fly frass fertilizer (BSFFF) is increasingly gaining momentum worldwide as organic fertilizer. However, research on its performance on crop production remains largely unknown. Here, we evaluate the comparative performance of BSFFF and commercial organic fertilizer (SAFI) on maize (H513) production. Both fertilizers were applied at the rates of 0, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 t ha-1, and 0, 30, 60, and 100 kg nitrogen (N) ha-1. Mineral fertilizer (urea) was also applied at 0, 30, 60 and 100 kg N ha-1 to establish the N fertilizer equivalence (NFE) of the organic fertilizers. Maize grown in plots treated with BSFFF had the tallest plants and highest chlorophyll concentrations. Plots treated with 7.5 t ha-1 of BSFFF had 14% higher grain yields than plots treated with a similar rate of SAFI. There was a 27% and 7% increase in grain yields in plots treated with 100 kg N ha-1 of BSFFF compared to those treated with equivalent rates of SAFI and urea fertilizers, respectively. Application of BSFFF at 7.5 t ha-1 significantly increased N uptake by up to 23% compared to the equivalent rate of SAFI. Likewise, application of BSFFF at 100 kg N ha-1 increased maize N uptake by 76% and 29% compared to SAFI and urea, respectively. Maize treated with BSFFF at 2.5 t ha-1 and 30 kg N ha-1 had higher nitrogen recovery efficiencies compared to equivalent rates of SAFI. The agronomic N use efficiency (AEN) of maize treated with 2.5 t ha-1 of BSFFF was 2.4 times higher than the value achieved using an equivalent rate of SAFI. Also, the AEN of maize grown using 30 kg N ha-1 was 27% and 116% higher than the values obtained using equivalent rates of SAFI and urea fertilizers, respectively. The NFE of BSFFF (108%) was 2.5 times higher than that of SAFI. Application rates of 2.5 t ha-1 and 30 kg N ha-1 of BSFFF were found to be effective in improving maize yield, while double rates of SAFI were required. Our findings demonstrate that BSFFF is a promising and sustainable alternative to commercial fertilizers for increased maize production.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.available2020-09-23en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBeesigamukama, D., Mochoge, B., Korir, N.K., Fiaboe, K.K., Nakimbugwe, D., Khamis, F.M., ... & Tanga, C.M. (2020). Exploring black soldier fly frass as novel fertilizer for improved growth, yield, and nitrogen use efficiency of maize under field conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 574592: 1-17.en_US
dcterms.extent1-17en_US
dcterms.issued2020en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dcterms.subjectagronomyen_US
dcterms.subjectfertilizersen_US
dcterms.subjecthermetia illucensen_US
dcterms.subjectmaizeen_US
dcterms.subjectyieldsen_US
dcterms.subjectnitrogen fertilizersen_US
dcterms.subjectblack soldier flyen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecologyen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationKenyatta Universityen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationBusitema Universityen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationMakerere Universityen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.574592en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryKenyaen_US
cg.identifier.iitathemeNATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENTen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KEen_US
cg.creator.identifierKomi Fiaboe: 0000-0001-5113-2159en_US
cg.contributor.donorInternational Development Research Centreen_US
cg.contributor.donorAustralian Centre for International Agricultural Researchen_US
cg.contributor.donorMinistry of Foreign Affairs, the Netherlandsen_US
cg.contributor.donorRockefeller Foundationen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalFrontiers in Plant Scienceen_US
cg.issn1664-462Xen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record