CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • CGIAR Research Programs and Platforms (2012-2021)
    • CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS)
    • CCAFS Journal Articles
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • CGIAR Research Programs and Platforms (2012-2021)
    • CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS)
    • CCAFS Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A global analysis of the impact of zero‐tillage on soil physical condition, organic carbon content, and plant root response

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Mondal, Surajit
    Chakraborty, Debashis
    Bandyopadhyay, Kalikinkar
    Aggarwal, Pramila
    Rana, Dharamvir Singh
    Date Issued
    2020-03
    Date Online
    2020-01
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Usage rights
    Copyrighted; all rights reserved
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Mondal S, Chakraborty D, Bandyopadhyay K, Aggarwal P, Rana DS. 2020. A global analysis of the impact of zero-tillage on soil physical condition, organic carbon content, and plant root response. Land Degradation & Development 31(5):557-567.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/111147
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3470
    Abstract/Description
    Food security involves the sustainable utilization of soil and land resources. Zero‐tillage (ZT) practice is a proponent of better resource utilization, to improve soil physical condition, and a potential sink to atmospheric carbon. However, the impact varies across climates, over the ZT history, cropping systems, and soil depths. A meta‐analysis was performed, based on 4,131 paired data from 522 studies spread globally, to evaluate the effect of ZT in comparison to conventional tillage, on soil physical condition (bulk density; mean weight diameter of aggregates; field capacity water content; and steady‐state infiltration rate), soil organic carbon (SOC) content, and the root response (root length density). Zero‐tillage significantly improved mean weight diameter of aggregates and field capacity water content at surface and subsurface layers by 19–58% and 6–16%, respectively, and resulted in no change in bulk density in either of the layers, but infiltration rate increased by 66%. Surface 0‐ to 5‐ and 5‐ to 10‐cm layers had significantly higher SOC content under ZT, whereas in other layers, the SOC content either reduced or did not change, resulting in a small and insignificant variation in the SOC stock (~1.1%) in favor of ZT. The root length density improved by ~35% in ZT only at 0‐ to 5‐cm soil depth. Effect of climate, soil type, or cropping system could not be broadly recognized, but the impact of ZT certainly increased over time. Improvements in soil aggregation and hydraulic properties are highly convincing with the adoption of ZT, and therefore, this practice leads to the better and sustainable use of soil resources.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Dr. Surajit Mondalhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6949-2419
    Debashis Chakrabortyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9664-8095
    CGIAR Impact Areas
    Nutrition, health and food security
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
    AGROVOC Keywords
    climate change; agriculture; food security; carbon
    Subjects
    PRIORITIES AND POLICIES FOR CSA; CLIMATE-SMART TECHNOLOGIES AND PRACTICES;
    Regions
    Asia; Southern Asia
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    Indian Council of Agricultural Research; International Rice Research Institute
    Collections
    • CCAFS Journal Articles [1251]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback