CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
    • CIFOR publications
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
    • CIFOR publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Rooting Forest Landscape Restoration in Consumer Markets—A Review of Existing Marketing-Based Funding Initiatives

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Bosshard, E.
    Jensen, M.
    Löfqvist, S.
    Kettle, Christopher J.
    Date Issued
    2021-01
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Bosshard, E, Jansen, M, Löfqvist, S., Kettle, C.J. (2021) Rooting Forest Landscape Restoration in Consumer Markets—A Review of Existing Marketing-Based Funding Initiatives. Frontiers in Forersts and Global Change, 3:589982. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.589982
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113080
    External link to download this item: https://www.cifor.org/library/7949
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.589982
    Abstract/Description
    Forest landscape restoration (FLR) is globally important to mitigate a wide range of social and environmental problems driven by landscape degradation and deforestation. Despite widespread recognition of the urgent need to restore biodiversity and ecological functioning across many forest landscapes, there is an apparent mismatch between political commitments and direct actions on the ground. Global markets and consumption patterns remain prominent drivers of land degradation. Alternatively, market forces could be transformed to have net positive rather than negative influence on land use change, offering innovative pathways to incentivise and finance FLR. Understanding current market mechanisms that finance FLR is essential for establishing best practices and effective policy. We reviewed 40 eco-marketing initiatives to provide an overview of the types of organizations involved in funding of FLR, and how they finance and enable FLR interventions. We identified three groups of initiatives: for-profit business, certified social enterprise, and non-profit organization. In total, 36 out of the reviewed initiatives collaborated with enabler-organizations to implement FLR activities. All initiatives promoted active tree planting, primarily in regenerative agroforestry systems. Only six analyzed initiatives included natural regeneration as a type of FLR intervention. This suggests that eco-marketing initiatives primarily focus on funding tree planting initiatives, possibly because tree planting is the easiest message to communicate to consumers. Strong safeguards and governance of FLR projects are necessary to ensure that tree planting projects do not overshadow other FLR interventions in areas where other approaches have more significant ecological, environmental, and social benefits.
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Forests, Trees and Agroforestry
    AGROVOC Keywords
    ecological restoration; finance; agroforestry; forest rehabilitation; natural regeneration
    Subjects
    FOREST AND LANDSCAPE RESTORATION;
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    ETH Zürich; Center for International Forestry Research; University of Koblenz-Landau; Kassel University; Bioversity International
    Collections
    • Alliance Bioversity CIAT Journal Articles [1100]
    • Alliance Research Lever 2: Multifunctional Landscapes [506]
    • Alliance Research Lever 4: Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture [568]
    • CIFOR publications [7743]
    • FTA outputs [1739]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback