CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI articles in journals
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI articles in journals
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Where might we find ecologically intact communities?

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Plumptre, A.J.
    Baisero, D.
    Belote, R.T.
    Vázquez-Domínguez, E.
    Faurby, S.
    Jȩdrzejewski, W.
    Kiara, Henry K.
    Kühl, H.
    Benítez-López, A.
    Luna-Aranguré, C.
    Voigt, M.
    Wich, S.
    Wint, W.
    Gallego-Zamorano, J.
    Boyd, C.
    Date Issued
    2021-04
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Plumptre, A.J., Baisero, D., Belote, R.T., Vázquez-Domínguez, E., Faurby, S., Jȩdrzejewski, W., Kiara, H., Kühl, H., Benítez-López, A., Luna-Aranguré, C., Voigt, M., Wich, S., Wint, W., Gallego-Zamorano, J. and Boyd, C. 2021. Where might we find ecologically intact communities? Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 4: 626635.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113569
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.626635
    Abstract/Description
    Conservation efforts should target the few remaining areas of the world that represent outstanding examples of ecological integrity and aim to restore ecological integrity to a much broader area of the world with intact habitat and minimal species loss while this is still possible. There have been many assessments of “intactness” in recent years but most of these use measures of anthropogenic impact at a site, rather than faunal intactness or ecological integrity. This paper makes the first assessment of faunal intactness for the global terrestrial land surface and assesses how many ecoregions have sites that could qualify as Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs – sites contributing significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity) based on their outstanding ecological integrity (under KBA Criterion C). Three datasets are combined on species loss at sites to create a new spatially explicit map of numbers of species extirpated. Based on this map it is estimated that no more than 2.9% of the land surface can be considered to be faunally intact. Additionally, using habitat/density distribution data for 15 large mammals we also make an initial assessment of areas where mammal densities are reduced, showing a further decrease in surface area to 2.8% of the land surface that could be considered functionally intact. Only 11% of the functionally intact areas that were identified are included within existing protected areas, and only 4% within existing KBAs triggered by other criteria. Our findings show that the number of ecoregions that could qualify as Criterion C KBAs could potentially increase land area up to 20% if their faunal composition was restored with the reintroduction of 1–5 species. Hence, if all necessary requirements are met in order to reintroduce species and regain faunal integrity, this will increase ecological integrity across much of the area where human impacts are low (human footprint ≤4). Focusing restoration efforts in these areas could significantly increase the area of the planet with full ecological integrity.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Henry Kiarahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9578-1636
    CGIAR Impact Areas
    Environmental health and biodiversity
    Contributes to SDGs
    SDG 15 - Life on land
    AGROVOC Keywords
    biodiversity; ecology
    Subjects
    BIODIVERSITY;
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    BirdLife International; University of Cambridge; Wilderness Society; Ciudad Universitaria; University of Gothenburg; Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas; International Livestock Research Institute; Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; Estación Biológica de Doñana; University of Kent; Liverpool John Moores University; University of Amsterdam; Environmental Research Group Oxford Ltd.; Radboud University Nijmegen; International Union for Conservation of Nature
    Investors/sponsors
    KBA Partnership; Daniel K. Thorne Foundation; Cambridge Conservation Initiative; Swedish Research Council; Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Spain
    Collections
    • ILRI animal and human health program outputs [1547]
    • ILRI articles in journals [6643]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback