Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOuma, Emily A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDione, Michel M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMtimet, Nadhemen_US
dc.contributor.authorLule, Peter M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorColston, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAdediran, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Deliaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-04T09:32:32Zen_US
dc.date.available2021-05-04T09:32:32Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/113629en_US
dc.titleDemand for Taenia solium cysticercosis vaccine: Lessons and insights from the pig production and trading nodes of the Uganda pig value chainen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractTaenia solium cysticercosis disease remains a key challenge to the pig sector in low- and middle-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and South East Asia, resulting in both economic losses and public health impacts. The World Health Organization has ranked it first on the global scale of foodborne parasites. A One Health approach has been recommended for reduction of infection pressure and eradication in the longer term. A new vaccine TSOL18 (Cysvax™), applied in combination with oxfendazole (Paranthic 10%™), a dewormer drug has been developed and field tested for the control of T. solium cysticercosis, with high potential to break the disease cycle. It is however unclear whether the products can be marketed through a market driven approach, and if smallholder pig farmers would be willing to take up and pay for the vaccine–oxfendazole combination. A choice experiment methodology was used to assess the potential demand and willingness to pay for the vaccine—oxfendazole combination by Ugandan smallholder pig farmers, and demand for vaccinated pigs by pig traders. The results showed that farmers highly valued quality assurance attributes and were not keen on the vaccine if there were no associated returns in the form of premium price for vaccinated pigs during sales. They were willing to pay US$ 2.31 for the vaccine if it resulted in a premium price for vaccinated pigs. Furthermore, they preferred an accompanying vaccine viability detector as part of its quality assurance. The pig traders on the other hand preferred high carcass weight of pigs, potentially achieved by using oxfendazole. The results show that unless the pig market systems pay a premium price for vaccinated pigs, and quality assurance systems guarantee quality vaccine, uptake of the TSOL18 vaccine and oxfendazole by farmers through market mechanisms may be unsuccessful. The current pig marketing system does not reward food safety, the focus is mainly on carcass weight. Alternative delivery mechanisms for the vaccine through a mix of private–public investments needs to be explored, as the benefits of vaccinated pigs are societal and include reduction and elimination of neurocysticercosis in the long run.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.audienceAcademicsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOuma, E., Dione, M., Mtimet, N., Lule, P., Colston, A., Adediran, S. and Grace, D. 2021. Demand for Taenia solium cysticercosis vaccine: Lessons and insights from the pig production and trading nodes of the Uganda pig value chain. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8: 611166.en_US
dcterms.extent611166en_US
dcterms.issued2021-04-27en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dcterms.subjectvaccinesen_US
dcterms.subjectswineen_US
dcterms.subjectanimal healthen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.subject.ilriANIMAL HEALTHen_US
cg.subject.ilriPIGSen_US
cg.subject.ilriVACCINESen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Fund for Agricultural Developmenten_US
cg.contributor.affiliationGlobal Alliance for Livestock Veterinary Medicinesen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Greenwichen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.611166en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryUgandaen_US
cg.contributor.crpAgriculture for Nutrition and Healthen_US
cg.contributor.crpLivestocken_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2UGen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaNutrition, health and food securityen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 2 - Zero hungeren_US
cg.creator.identifierEmily Ouma: 0000-0002-3123-1376en_US
cg.creator.identifierMichel Dione: 0000-0001-7812-5776en_US
cg.creator.identifierNadhem Mtimet: 0000-0003-3125-2828en_US
cg.creator.identifierDelia Grace: 0000-0002-0195-9489en_US
cg.contributor.donorBill & Melinda Gates Foundationen_US
cg.contributor.donorGovernment of the United Kingdomen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalFrontiers in Veterinary Scienceen_US
cg.issn2297-1769en_US
cg.volume8en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record