Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWangchuk, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChoden, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSears, R.R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaral, H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYoezer, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTamang, K.T.D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChoden, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWangdi, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDorji, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDukpa, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTshering, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThinley, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDhendup, T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T03:44:30Zen_US
dc.date.available2021-07-29T03:44:30Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/114445en_US
dc.titleCommunity perception of ecosystem services from commercially managed forests in Bhutanen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractGiven the direct dependence rural communities have on forests, understanding ecosystem services can empower communities and align stakeholders to define priorities and objectives for the sustainable management of forest resources. In this qualitative study on the forest ecosystem services in Bhutan, we assessed community awareness and perceptions of local forest ecosystem services, identified their top priorities, and evaluated how they have changed over time. The study focused on state reserve forest areas designated for commercial timber production, formally known as forest management units (FMU). We held focus group discussions separately with women and men associated with five FMUs in the central belt of the country. Participants identified 45 ecosystem services, with soil productivity, freshwater, timber, fresh air, construction stone, carbon sequestration, spiritual value, pollination, and local weather regulation comprising the most highly valued services critical to local livelihood and well-being. Participants felt that forest ecosystem services have been generally declining over the past decade in the FMUs and identified a need for forest restoration activities to improve their delivery. We recommend that state forest entities conduct an awareness campaign to empower communities with the conceptual framework and globally recognized concepts to advocate for their needs related to forests. We also recommend that biophysical and economic studies be conducted in these areas to seek evidence for causal linkages between natural resource use and the status of ecosystem services. This study contributes to a growing literature on ecosystem services in Bhutan and provides a basis for future studies to understand how management activities can impact the delivery of critical services.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWangchuk, J., Choden, K., Sears, R.R., Baral, H., Yoezer, D., Tamang, K.T.D., Choden, T., Wangdi, N., Dorji, S., Dukpa, D., Tshering, K., Thinley, C. and Dhendup, T. 2021. Community perception of ecosystem services from commercially managed forests in Bhutan. Ecosystem Services 50: 101335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101335en_US
dcterms.extent101335en_US
dcterms.issued2021-08en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dcterms.subjectecological restorationen_US
dcterms.subjectforest managementen_US
dcterms.subjectcommunity forestryen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationCenter for International Forestry Researchen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUgyen Wangchuck Institute for Conservation and Environmental Researchen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationHarvard Universityen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationBhutan Royal Society for Protection of Natureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Melbourneen_US
cg.subject.ciforFOREST MANAGEMENTen_US
cg.identifier.urlhttps://www.cifor.org/library/8089en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101335en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryBhutanen_US
cg.contributor.crpForests, Trees and Agroforestryen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2BTen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalEcosystem Servicesen_US
cg.issn2212-0416en_US
cg.volume50en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record