CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
    • CIFOR publications
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
    • CIFOR publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Impacts of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Cat Tien National Park

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Pham Thu Thuy
    Nguyen, T.D.
    Dao, C.T.L.
    Hoang, L.T.
    Pham, L.H.
    Nguyen, L.T.
    Tran, B.K.
    Date Issued
    2021-07
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Pham, T.T., Nguyen, T.D., Dao, C.T.L., Hoang, L.T., Pham, L.H., Nguyen, L.T. and Tran, B.K. 2021. Impacts of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Cat Tien National Park. Forests 12(7): 921. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070921
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114448
    External link to download this item: https://www.cifor.org/library/8092
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070921
    Abstract/Description
    This paper assesses the impacts of Payment for Forest Environmental Services (PFES) in Cat Tien National Park, Vietnam. We analyze the impacts and additionality of PFES on local livelihoods by comparing the socio-economic situations in four pairs of villages before and after its implementation, and between places where PFES is and is not applied. In total, 149 people participated in focus group discussions, while 244 households (123 in areas with PFES and 121 in areas without) took part in household surveys. Our research shows that 92% of the people interviewed are from ethnic minorities participating and benefiting directly from PFES. In villages with PFES, the numbers of participating households ranged from 45% to 88% of all poor households in those villages. Of the poor households participating in PFES in the studied villages, 22% have no source of cash income other than their forest protection contracts, while 81.4% have escaped poverty, based on self-defined poverty criteria, through additional income from forest protection. Since the implementation of PFES, the area of forests allocated for community and household management is estimated to be three to 3.64 times higher than it had been previously. Although the number of communities under PFES contracts has not changed, the number of households participating in forest protection contracts is now much lower than before PFES started. On average, PFES contributes 16% to 74% of total household income in villages with PFES. Incomes in places with PFES are significantly higher than in places without. Although our research demonstrates immediate positive socio-economic impacts on livelihoods, it also highlights weaknesses in the current monitoring and evaluation system and a lack of reliable data for measuring PFES impacts in Cat Tien National Park.
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Forests, Trees and Agroforestry
    AGROVOC Keywords
    ecosystem services; national parks; socioeconomic development
    Subjects
    FOREST MANAGEMENT;
    Countries
    Vietnam
    Regions
    South-eastern Asia
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    Center for International Forestry Research; Cat Tien National Park Vietnam
    Collections
    • CIFOR publications [7743]
    • FTA outputs [1739]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback