Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPham Thu Thuyen_US
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, T.D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDao, C.T.L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHoang, L.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPham, L.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, L.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTran, B.K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T07:19:07Zen_US
dc.date.available2021-07-29T07:19:07Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/114448en_US
dc.titleImpacts of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Cat Tien National Parken_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper assesses the impacts of Payment for Forest Environmental Services (PFES) in Cat Tien National Park, Vietnam. We analyze the impacts and additionality of PFES on local livelihoods by comparing the socio-economic situations in four pairs of villages before and after its implementation, and between places where PFES is and is not applied. In total, 149 people participated in focus group discussions, while 244 households (123 in areas with PFES and 121 in areas without) took part in household surveys. Our research shows that 92% of the people interviewed are from ethnic minorities participating and benefiting directly from PFES. In villages with PFES, the numbers of participating households ranged from 45% to 88% of all poor households in those villages. Of the poor households participating in PFES in the studied villages, 22% have no source of cash income other than their forest protection contracts, while 81.4% have escaped poverty, based on self-defined poverty criteria, through additional income from forest protection. Since the implementation of PFES, the area of forests allocated for community and household management is estimated to be three to 3.64 times higher than it had been previously. Although the number of communities under PFES contracts has not changed, the number of households participating in forest protection contracts is now much lower than before PFES started. On average, PFES contributes 16% to 74% of total household income in villages with PFES. Incomes in places with PFES are significantly higher than in places without. Although our research demonstrates immediate positive socio-economic impacts on livelihoods, it also highlights weaknesses in the current monitoring and evaluation system and a lack of reliable data for measuring PFES impacts in Cat Tien National Park.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPham, T.T., Nguyen, T.D., Dao, C.T.L., Hoang, L.T., Pham, L.H., Nguyen, L.T. and Tran, B.K. 2021. Impacts of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Cat Tien National Park. Forests 12(7): 921. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070921en_US
dcterms.extent921en_US
dcterms.issued2021-07-15en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dcterms.subjectnational parksen_US
dcterms.subjectsocioeconomic developmenten_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationCenter for International Forestry Researchen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationCat Tien National Park Vietnamen_US
cg.subject.ciforFOREST MANAGEMENTen_US
cg.identifier.urlhttps://www.cifor.org/library/8092en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/f12070921en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryVietnamen_US
cg.contributor.crpForests, Trees and Agroforestryen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2VNen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalForestsen_US
cg.issn1999-4907en_US
cg.volume12en_US
cg.issue7en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record