Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBon, P.V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHarwood, C.E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNghiem, Q.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThinh, H.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSon, D.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChinh, N.V.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T08:08:11Zen_US
dc.date.available2020-10-29T08:08:11Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/114455en_US
dc.titleGrowth of triploid and diploid Acacia clones in three contrasting environments in Viet Namen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractWe assessed the growth and adaptability of triploid acacia clones in comparison with commercially planted diploid clones of the same taxa to age three years at three contrasting sites in north, central and south Viet Nam. Application of phosphorus fertiliser at planting gave a growth response only in the trial in central Viet Nam. One triploid Acacia hybrid (Acacia auriculiformis × mangium) clone was constantly the best performer in all sites, achieving mean annual increments at three years of 30.1, 26.6 and 32.1 m3 ha−1 in northern, central and southern Viet Nam, respectively. Two other triploid hybrid clones outperformed the diploid controls in southern Viet Nam. A single triploid A. auriculiformis clone and two diploid clones of this species grew much more slowly. Triploid Acacia hybrid clones had a lower incidence of Corticium salmonicolor (pink disease) and Ceratocystis disease symptoms than did diploid hybrid clones. The wind-firmness of triploid Acacia hybrid clones was comparable with or better than the diploid hybrid clones. Triploid breeding offers a promising new pathway in the development of improved Acacia planting material.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.available2020-10-16en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBon, P.V., Harwood, C.E., Nghiem, Q.C., Thinh, H.H., Son, D.H. and Chinh, N.V., 2020. Growth of triploid and diploid Acacia clones in three contrasting environments in Viet Nam. Australian Forestry, 83(4), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2020.1819009en_US
dcterms.extent265-274en_US
dcterms.issued2020-10-01en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dcterms.publisherInforma UK Limiteden_US
dcterms.subjectploidyen_US
dcterms.subjectgrowth rateen_US
dcterms.subjectdiseaseen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationWorld Agroforestry Centreen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationVietnamese Academy of Forest Sciencesen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Tasmaniaen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2020.1819009en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryVietnamen_US
cg.contributor.crpForests, Trees and Agroforestryen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2VNen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalAustralian Forestryen_US
cg.issn0004-9158en_US
cg.volume83en_US
cg.issue4en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record