CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
    • Alliance Bioversity CIAT Reports
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
    • Alliance Bioversity CIAT Reports
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Experience capitalization of Gudoberet- and Hosanna-Jawe landscape restoration process in Ethiopia

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Experience_Admassu_2021.pdf (4.364Mb)
    Authors
    Admassue, Zenebe
    Tamene, Lulseged D.
    Date Issued
    2021-11
    Language
    en
    Type
    Report
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Admassue, Z.; Tamene, L. (2021) Experience capitalization of Gudoberet- and Hosanna-Jawe landscape restoration process in Ethiopia. 44 p.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/116243
    Abstract/Description
    This study was undertaken in the Gudoberet- and Jawe landscapes located in Amhara and SNNP regions of Ethiopia, respectively. Experience Capitalization (EC) process approach was used to capture a wide range of experiences related to landscape restoration project in Gudoberet- and Jawe landscapes. Although there has been several studies regarding landscape restoration in Ethiopia, the use of EC process in landscape restoration is the first attempt in the country. The approach involves various procedures such as selecting the intervention, setting the boundaries of intervention, gathering information, describing interventions and analysis (filtering lessons). SWC on cultivated lands, gully rehabilitation, exclosure and water harvesting were the major interventions implemented for landscape restoration. Focus group discussion, key informant interview and transect walks were used to gather primary information. The result shows that participants considered economic, environmental, social and gender criteria to assess landscape restoration interventions. Based on the EC process, the following major lessons are identified: • Since landscape restoration requires multiple interventions, strengthening collaboration and integration of institutions including CGIAR centers is crucial to improve the success of landscape restoration program in the country. • Although livestock management is considered as an important part of the landscape restoration process in both sites, free grazing affected the adoption of biological SWC measures. The experience shows that there is a long way to achieve complete cut-and-carry system of livestock production mainly due to insufficient biomass production that can be used as cut-and carry system. Unless a complete cut-and-carry system is practiced, investment in landscape restoration mainly soil and water conservation practices will continue indefinitely. Strategies are being explored to reduce the number of livestock and enhance biomass to enhance the adoption of cut-and-carry livestock production system. • Sectoral integration (crop, livestock, forest, water, etc.) will be crucial for the successful achievement of landscape restoration efforts. • Creating awareness using various approaches, government focus on landscape management, collaboration among institutions, commitment of project staff and the community contributed for the success of landscape restoration process. • There is a clear need to integrate income generating options and youth employment schemes into the landscape restoration efforts to sustain the land and water management practices and their benefits. • Proper linkages between ‘research’ and development organizations is crucial to bring in win-win solutions focusing on their areas of mandate for the success of landscape restoration efforts. • Use of cross-site visits, evidence generation, multi-stakeholder integration, community mobilization, linked technologies and use of physical and biological SWC are the major lessons learned for successful restoration. However, this study focused only on two small landscapes with minimum investment in landscape restoration. It is clear that the country has invested heavily in landscape restoration activities through various projects such as SLMP, MERET and PSNP. However, the outcomes in terms of EC are yet to be fully understood under these projects. Hence, a comprehensive EC on needs to be explored for the adoption of successful approaches in landscape restoration process in the country and beyond.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Lulseged Tamenehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3806-8890
    CGIAR Impact Areas
    Climate adaptation and mitigation; Environmental health and biodiversity
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security; Water, Land and Ecosystems
    Contributes to SDGs
    SDG 15 - Life on land
    AGROVOC Keywords
    landscape conservation; natural resources management; livestock management; ecosystem services; conservación del paisaje; ordenación de recursos naturales; manejo del ganado
    Subjects
    AGRICULTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;
    Countries
    Ethiopia
    Regions
    Sub-Saharan Africa; Eastern Africa
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    International Water Management Institute; International Center for Tropical Agriculture
    Investors/sponsors
    European Union; United States Agency for International Development
    Collections
    • Alliance Bioversity CIAT Reports [569]
    • Alliance Research Lever 2: Multifunctional Landscapes [506]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback