Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKolawole, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKulakow, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorSamuel, T.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbass, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDiallo, T.A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-21T09:38:27Zen_US
dc.date.available2021-12-21T09:38:27Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/116926en_US
dc.titleComparative evaluation of four different cassava peeling devicesen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaAGRIBUSINESSen_US
cg.subject.iitaAGRONOMYen_US
cg.subject.iitaCASSAVAen_US
cg.subject.iitaFOOD SECURITYen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT BREEDINGen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT PRODUCTIONen_US
cg.subject.iitaSOCIOECONOMYen_US
cg.subject.iitaVALUE CHAINSen_US
dcterms.abstractManual method predominates in the cassava peeling industry in Nigeria as more than 70% of the processed cassava in the market passed through manual process. Mechanical option has come to the forefront since other processing methods are discouraged based on their deficiencies. This work investigates improvements recorded with mechanical method over the manual method, and the inherent challenges of stakeholders in the industry. Three cassava peeling machines namely, BASICON, FATAROY and WAMABCO, were selected under the mechanical method. Manual method was also evaluated under similar test conditions. Performance evaluation was carried out on each cassava peeler to assess their fuel and power utilization, cost and ease of operation. Manual peeling process recorded an average peeling efficiency of 100% and average percentage tuber flesh loss of 5.5%. The BASICON cassava peeler had an average peeling efficiency of 96% and average percentage tuber flesh loss of 75%. The FATAROY cassava peeler had an average peeling efficiency of 72% with 23% average percentage tuber flesh loss. The WAMABCO cassava peeler had an average peeling efficiency of 64% and average percentage tuber flesh loss of 14%. The energy consumption rate obtained for the FATAROY cassava peeler was the best of all. The three cassava peelers evaluated performed 10 times faster than the manual method adopted for cassava peeling operation. The capacity of each of the machines was less than 800 kg/h, which is too small for industrial application. Manual method was the slowest and the most expensive, but offered a superior quality output. Small-scale processors therefore require suitable cassava peelers to aid the peeling operation of cassava in Nigeria’s cassava processing industry.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKolawole, P., Kulakow, P., Samuel, T.M., Abass, A. & Diallo, T.A. (2021). Comparative evaluation of four different cassava peeling devices. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, 52(2), 74-81.en_US
dcterms.extent74-81en_US
dcterms.issued2021en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dcterms.subjectcassavaen_US
dcterms.subjectmechanical peelingen_US
dcterms.subjectpeelingen_US
dcterms.subjectprocessingen_US
dcterms.subjectnigeriaen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationOlabisi Onabanjo Universityen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryNigeriaen_US
cg.contributor.crpAgriculture for Nutrition and Healthen_US
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananasen_US
cg.identifier.iitathemeBIOTECH & PLANT BREEDINGen_US
cg.identifier.iitathemeSOCIAL SCIENCE & AGRICUSINESSen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2NGen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaNutrition, health and food securityen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 2 - Zero hungeren_US
cg.creator.identifierPeter Kulakow: 0000-0002-7574-2645en_US
cg.creator.identifierAdebayo Abass: 0000-0003-1376-3608en_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalAgricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin Americaen_US
cg.issn0084-5841en_US
cg.volume52en_US
cg.issue2en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record