Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKozicka, Martaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, Sara K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGotor, Elisabettaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEnahoro, Dolapo K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-03T08:03:13Zen_US
dc.date.available2022-02-03T08:03:13Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/117921en_US
dc.titleCross-scale trade-off analysis for sustainable development: Linking future demand for animal source foods and ecosystem services provision to the SDGsen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractDietary transition towards higher consumption of animal source foods (ASF) associated with higher incomes across low and middle-income countries could have negative impacts on environmental systems and their potential in the long run to provide services necessary for achieving multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In this article, we integrate economic, land use allocation, and biophysical models to investigate trade-offs between the five ecosystem services and their contributions to various SDGs associated with agricultural expansion to meet future demand for ASF, using Tanzania as a case study. Our results show that under the scenario of sustainable socio-economic development, between 2010 and 2030 in Tanzania, per capita income grows by 169% and the share of population at risk of hunger declines from 34.8% to 23%. These changes can be associated on a macro-level with positive contributions to achievement of SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 2 (Zero Hunger). To satisfy feed demand for increased livestock production domestically, an increase by 21.4% of biomass production as compared to 2010 is needed. Analysis of alternative scenarios for meeting this new demand shows potential threats on a landscape level to achieving numerous SDGs and more generally to attaining sustainable food systems. Ecosystem-based contributions primarily decline to SDGs: SDG 3 (Health), SDG 6 (Clean Water), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities), SDG 13 (Climate) and SDG 15 (Terrestrial Life). We find that higher crop productivity and redesign of agro-ecosystems to increase on-farm tree cover could significantly limit these losses. Alternatively, the growing demand for ASF could be satisfied with imports, which would allow for reducing the trade-offs locally. However, this would result in at least partially only displacing ecosystem service losses to the exporting countries.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.available2021-12-27en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKozicka, M.; Jones, S.K.; Gotor, E.; Enahoro, D. (2021) Cross-scale trade-off analysis for sustainable development: Linking future demand for animal source foods and ecosystem services provision to the SDGs. Sustainability Science 17 p. 209-220. ISSN: 1862-4065en_US
dcterms.extentp. 209-220en_US
dcterms.issued2022-01en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dcterms.subjectsustainable development goalsen_US
dcterms.subjectlivestock productionen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dcterms.subjecteconomic analysisen_US
dcterms.subjectoptimization methodsen_US
dcterms.subjectobjetivos de desarrollo sostenibleen_US
dcterms.subjectproducción pecuariaen_US
dcterms.subjectservicios de los ecosistemasen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburgen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationBioversity Internationalen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Instituteen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01082-yen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryTanzaniaen_US
cg.contributor.crpPolicies, Institutions, and Marketsen_US
cg.subject.alliancebiovciatECONOMICSen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2TZen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaEnvironmental health and biodiversityen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaNutrition, health and food securityen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 1 - No povertyen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 2 - Zero hungeren_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 3 - Good health and well-beingen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 12 - Responsible consumption and productionen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 13 - Climate actionen_US
cg.creator.identifierMarta Kozicka: 0000-0002-2323-3689en_US
cg.creator.identifierSarah K. Jones: 0000-0002-9422-5563en_US
cg.creator.identifierElisabetta Gotor: 0000-0003-0533-3077en_US
cg.creator.identifierDolapo Enahoro: 0000-0002-4927-5617en_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalSustainability Scienceen_US
cg.issn1862-4065en_US
cg.volume17en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record