Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNjingulula, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMatungulu, P.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMasuki, K.F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchut, Marcen_US
dc.contributor.authorOkafor, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWimba, B.M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T10:16:16Zen_US
dc.date.available2022-04-19T10:16:16Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/119341en_US
dc.titleCan Innovation Platforms (IPs) improve rural women participation in maize value chain? evidence from the eastern DR Congoen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaAGRIBUSINESSen_US
cg.subject.iitaAGRONOMYen_US
cg.subject.iitaCAPACITY DEVELOPMENTen_US
cg.subject.iitaGENDERen_US
cg.subject.iitaMAIZEen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT BREEDINGen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT PRODUCTIONen_US
cg.subject.iitaSMALLHOLDER FARMERSen_US
cg.subject.iitaSOCIOECONOMYen_US
cg.subject.iitaVALUE CHAINSen_US
dcterms.abstractThis study explored the potential of the Innovation Platform approach, in improving the participation of rural female farmers in Maize value chain. It intends to identify the peculiarities, in terms of challenges and opportunities related to its application to the rural women realities. The study collected data from 120 small scale maize producers in South Kivu province of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) from 2015 to 2017, using individual interview and focus group discussion (FGD) for data confirmation. Data was analyzed using the Average Effect of Treatment of treated (ATT) and the propensity matching score to assess the effect of IP approach on rural women, who were randomly selected to participate in an innovation platform composed solely of women (100%) against those participating in a mixed innovation platform, made of 70% of men. The results show that the Innovation platform approach allowed women to address their basic challenges and improve their participation in the maize value chain. Average individual income from participation to the Innovation Platform increased from $ 100 to $ 300 per cropping season and the average earning of a women in a platform made of women solely was $552.6 higher than that of women participating in mixed platform $432.4. We hypothesized that the main benefits from the female IP would be increased maize yields. However, the analysis shows that although yield increased, the main effect was due to improved market access provided by the IP." The implementation of the innovation platform process encountered several challenges, in particular: building a consensus when the interests of the groups in place have proven to be divergent, the barrier of social consideration (social stereotype), inability of smallholder’s farmers to learn quickly and fully play expected role, the traditional culture of learning, visioning the process. Despite these challenges, IPs offered small-scale maize producers many technical, organizational and material opportunities, including income generation, access to inputs and to lucrative markets, acquisition of diversified knowledge and skills, ability to work in a commercial environment, benefiting from the services of experts, accessing new sources of financing, they could not benefit otherwise. These findings imply that to be effective for rural women, an innovation platform should include individuals with no wide social disparity and diversify the sources of income, including livestock and others off farm activitiesen_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.available2020-05-21en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNjingulula, P., Matungulu, P.K., Masuki, K.F., Schut, M., Okafor, C. & Wimba, B.M. (2020). Can Innovation Platforms (IPs) improve rural women participation in maize value chain? evidence from the eastern DR Congo. European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 2(3), 1-10.en_US
dcterms.extent1-10en_US
dcterms.issued2020-05en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherEuropean Open Science Publishingen_US
dcterms.subjectwomen farmersen_US
dcterms.subjectinnovation platformsen_US
dcterms.subjectmaizeen_US
dcterms.subjectvalue chainen_US
dcterms.subjectparticipationen_US
dcterms.subjectdemocratic republic of the congoen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInstitut National pour l'Etude et la Recherche Agronomiques, Democratic Republic of Congoen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationAssociation for Land use, Environmental care Research and Technology transferen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.24018/ejfood.2020.2.3.16en_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionMiddle Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryCongo, Democratic Republic ofen_US
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananasen_US
cg.identifier.iitathemeNATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENTen_US
cg.identifier.iitathemeSOCIAL SCIENCE & AGRICUSINESSen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2CDen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaGender equality, youth and social inclusionen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 5 - Gender equalityen_US
cg.creator.identifierKande M PAUL MATUNGULU: 0000-0001-5664-951Xen_US
cg.creator.identifierMarc Schut: 0000-0002-3361-4581en_US
cg.creator.identifierChris Okafor: 0000-0003-2162-6101en_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalEuropean Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciencesen_US
cg.issn2684-1827en_US
cg.volume2en_US
cg.issue3en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record