CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Potato Center (CIP)
    • CIP Journal Articles
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Potato Center (CIP)
    • CIP Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Participatory validation and optimization of the Triple S method for sweetpotato planting material conservation in southern Ethiopia

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Hundayehu, M.C.
    McEwan, M.
    Namanda, S.
    Low, Jan W.
    Vandamme, E.
    Brouwer, R.
    Date Issued
    2022-03
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Hundayehu, M. C.; McEwan, M.; Namanda, S.; Low, J. W.; Vandamme, E.; Brouwer, R. 2022. Participatory validation and optimization of the Triple S method for sweetpotato planting material conservation in southern Ethiopia. Open Agriculture. ISSN 2391-9531. 7(1), 120–131.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/119373
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2021-0063
    Abstract/Description
    A climate-resilient, root-based sweetpotato planting material (SPM) conservation method called “Triple S” or “Storage in Sand and Sprouting” has created timely access to sweetpotato planting material in areas with a prolonged dry season in Uganda and Tanzania. The aim of this study was to validate and optimize the Triple S method for conservation of sweetpotato planting material in dry areas of southern Ethiopia. The Triple S method was validated in four districts of southern Ethiopia on varieties Kulfo and Awassa 83 and compared with two common local planting material conservation methods: leaving “volunteer roots” in the soil which then sprout at the onset of rains; and planting vines under shade or mulch. Across study locations and for both varieties, Triple S resulted in a higher survival rate (81–95%) in storage during the dry season compared to the local conservation methods (7–57%). Plants of both varieties grown from roots conserved with the Triple S method showed significantly higher vine growth and lower weevil and virus infection symptoms compared to plants grown from the two local conservation methods. An additional experiment found that planting at the start of the main rainy season in June and harvesting just before the start of the dry season in October gives the highest number of medium-sized and weevil-free roots suitable for Triple S. The current study demonstrated that the Triple S method is a promising technology for small-scale sweetpotato farmers in dry areas for timely access to high-quality planting material.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    mihiretu hundayehuhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-7175
    Margaret A. McEwanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8510-0526
    NAMANDA SAMhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7822-0626
    Jan Lowhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8170-6045
    Elke Vandammehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0961-6528
    Roland Brouwerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1419-9175
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Roots, Tubers and Bananas
    AGROVOC Keywords
    seed systems; dry season; curculionidae; viroses; sweet potatoes; vitamin a deficiency
    Subjects
    CROP PROTECTION; CROP AND SYSTEMS SCIENCES CSS; NUTRITION; NUTRITIONAL SECURITY; SWEETPOTATOES; SWEETPOTATO AGRI-FOOD SYSTEMS;
    Countries
    Ethiopia
    Regions
    Eastern Africa
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    International Potato Center
    Investors/sponsors
    Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
    Collections
    • CIP Journal Articles [1044]
    • CIP sweetpotato agri-food systems program [524]
    • RTB Journal Articles [1344]
    • Sweetpotato Action for Security and Health in Africa (SASHA) [63]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback