Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOkori, Patricken_US
dc.contributor.authorMunthali, Willsen_US
dc.contributor.authorMsere, Harryen_US
dc.contributor.authorCharlie, Harveyen_US
dc.contributor.authorHitaya, Sokaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSichali, Felixen_US
dc.contributor.authorChilumpha, Ethelen_US
dc.contributor.authorChirwa, Teddieen_US
dc.contributor.authorSeetha, Anithaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChinyamuyamu, Bettyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMonyo, Emmanuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSiambi, Mosesen_US
dc.contributor.authorChirwa, Rowlanden_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-14T08:47:22Zen_US
dc.date.available2022-07-14T08:47:22Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/120097en_US
dc.titleImproving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from Malawien_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Agri-innovations are mostly delivered to farmers through private and public sector-led institutions around the world, with various degrees of success in Malawi. These distribution systems, on the other hand, do not meet everyone’s production and productivity needs, particularly those of smallholder farmers. Alternative gap-flling systems are therefore required. Over the course of 7 years, we performed two studies in Malawi to assess the efciency of integrated farmer led agri-innovation delivery mechanisms, in order to advise programming and delivery improvements. The frst study looked at the impact of farmer-led technology delivery on agricultural output and productivity. It was split into two phases: learning (2010–2015) and scaling-out (2016–2019). The second study looked at how smallholder farmers changed their behaviour, after receiving instruction during the scaling-out phase. A farmer led social network, community seed banks, was used as the research platform. Results: The number of farmers who had access to improved seed increased by 35-fold from 2.4% in the baseline year. Groundnut, the major study crop, had a 1.8-fold increase in productivity. In sorghum, and common bean, the diference in grain yield between benefciaries and control populations was 19% and 30%, respectively. The lowest afatoxin contamination was found in groundnut grain samples from trained farmers, showing that learning had occurred, with three training sessions sufcient for initiating and sustaining adoption of agri-innovations. Conclusions: Many developing country economies have limited investments in agricultural extension and advisory services, and as well as inefcient agri-input delivery systems, limiting access to science solutions needed to boost productivity. The farmer-led technology and knowledge dissemination systems examined in this research, are appropriate for a variety farming contexts, especially for crops underinvested by private sector, and where public extension and advisory services are poorly funded.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.available2022-07-08en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOkori, P.; Munthali, W.; Msere, H.; Charlie, H.; Chitaya, S.; Sichali, F.; Chilumpha, E.; Chirwa, T.; Seetha, A.; Chinyamuyamu, B.; Monyo, E.; Siambi, M.; Chirwa, R. (2022) Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from Malawi. Agriculture & Food Security 11: 38. 14 p. ISSN: 2048-7010en_US
dcterms.extent14 p.en_US
dcterms.issued2022-12en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dcterms.subjectagricultural innovationen_US
dcterms.subjectcerealsen_US
dcterms.subjectseed systemsen_US
dcterms.subjectsmallholdersen_US
dcterms.subjectscaling upen_US
dcterms.subjectinnovación agrícolaen_US
dcterms.subjectcerealesen_US
dcterms.subjectsistemas de semillasen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropicsen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Center for Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00375-4en_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryMalawien_US
cg.subject.alliancebiovciatAGRICULTUREen_US
cg.subject.alliancebiovciatINFORMATION SYSTEMSen_US
cg.subject.alliancebiovciatSEED SYSTEMSen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MWen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaPoverty reduction, livelihoods and jobsen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 15 - Life on landen_US
cg.creator.identifierRowland Chirwa: 0000-0003-2977-9786en_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalAgriculture & Food Securityen_US
cg.issn2048-7010en_US
cg.volume11en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record