CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • CGIAR 2030 research initiatives (2022-2024)
    • CGIAR Initiative on Low-Emission Food Systems
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • CGIAR 2030 research initiatives (2022-2024)
    • CGIAR Initiative on Low-Emission Food Systems
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Understanding trade-offs and synergies among soil functions to support decision-making for sustainable cultivated land use

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Zhao, Rui
    Gabriel, Jose Luis
    Martin, Jose Antonio Rodriguez
    Feng, Zhe
    Wu, Kening
    Date Issued
    2022-11
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Zhao, Rui; Gabriel, Jose Luis; Martin, Jose Antonio Rodriguez; Feng, Zhe; and Wu, Kening. 2022. Understanding trade-offs and synergies among soil functions to support decision-making for sustainable cultivated land use. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10:1063907. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1063907
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/126236
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1063907
    Abstract/Description
    Soil provides a diverse and complex range of ecosystem services. Understanding the trade-offs and synergies among soil functions is foundational for effective soil ecosystem management and human well-being. In contrast, the long-term pursuit of solely productive functions in cultivated land use has resulted in soil degradation and weakened other ecological functions. This study collected soil, topographic landform, climate, and management data from 151 fields in four counties and three climatic zones in China. The Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model was used to evaluate nutrient retention, water production, and carbon storage, and the market value method was used to evaluate the value of the soil production function. A semi-quantitative model of Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) was used to simulate soil processes, thus revealing factors potentially influencing the supply capacity of five soil functions. Sensitivity analysis was used to identify the key variables influencing soil functional supply, and the probabilistic inference was used to identify interactions among soil’s multiple functions. The main findings were as follows: 1) In four counties, the spatial heterogeneity in the supply of the five soil functions was relatively high. 2) The primary variables influencing the supply of soil’s multiple functions were climatic conditions, management level, carbon storage, soil nutrients, soil biology, soil structure, and topography. 3) Trade-offs existed among primary productivity (PP), water purification and regulation (WPR), and carbon sequestration and regulation (CSR). Moreover, the provision of functional and intrinsic biodiversity (PFIB), WPR, and CSR were synergistic; specifically, the CSR and WPR services synergized with the nutrient provision and cycling (PCN). This research may aid in understanding the supply of, and interactions among soil’s multiple functions, thus aiding in using BBNs to analyze soil ecosystem services. In addition, this study may provide a reference for management decision-making to maximize the overall benefits of soil functions in cultivated land use.
    CGIAR Action Areas
    Systems Transformation
    CGIAR Initiatives
    Low-Emission Food Systems
    AGROVOC Keywords
    soil functions; soil; land use; ecosystem services; ecosystem management; ecosystems; nutrients; water; carbon; biodiversity; soil analysis; decision making
    Countries
    China
    Regions
    Asia; Eastern Asia
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    China University of Geosciences; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Spain; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid; Technology innovation center of land engineering; Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation
    Investors/sponsors
    Natural Science Foundation of China; CGIAR Trust Fund; National Key R&D Program of China
    Collections
    • CGIAR Initiative on Low-Emission Food Systems [136]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback