Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhao, Ruien_US
dc.contributor.authorGabriel, Jose Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Jose Antonio Rodriguezen_US
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Zheen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Keningen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T09:42:42Zen_US
dc.date.available2022-12-22T09:42:42Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/126236en_US
dc.titleUnderstanding trade-offs and synergies among soil functions to support decision-making for sustainable cultivated land useen_US
cg.authorship.typesNot CGIAR international instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractSoil provides a diverse and complex range of ecosystem services. Understanding the trade-offs and synergies among soil functions is foundational for effective soil ecosystem management and human well-being. In contrast, the long-term pursuit of solely productive functions in cultivated land use has resulted in soil degradation and weakened other ecological functions. This study collected soil, topographic landform, climate, and management data from 151 fields in four counties and three climatic zones in China. The Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model was used to evaluate nutrient retention, water production, and carbon storage, and the market value method was used to evaluate the value of the soil production function. A semi-quantitative model of Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) was used to simulate soil processes, thus revealing factors potentially influencing the supply capacity of five soil functions. Sensitivity analysis was used to identify the key variables influencing soil functional supply, and the probabilistic inference was used to identify interactions among soil’s multiple functions. The main findings were as follows: 1) In four counties, the spatial heterogeneity in the supply of the five soil functions was relatively high. 2) The primary variables influencing the supply of soil’s multiple functions were climatic conditions, management level, carbon storage, soil nutrients, soil biology, soil structure, and topography. 3) Trade-offs existed among primary productivity (PP), water purification and regulation (WPR), and carbon sequestration and regulation (CSR). Moreover, the provision of functional and intrinsic biodiversity (PFIB), WPR, and CSR were synergistic; specifically, the CSR and WPR services synergized with the nutrient provision and cycling (PCN). This research may aid in understanding the supply of, and interactions among soil’s multiple functions, thus aiding in using BBNs to analyze soil ecosystem services. In addition, this study may provide a reference for management decision-making to maximize the overall benefits of soil functions in cultivated land use.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZhao, Rui; Gabriel, Jose Luis; Martin, Jose Antonio Rodriguez; Feng, Zhe; and Wu, Kening. 2022. Understanding trade-offs and synergies among soil functions to support decision-making for sustainable cultivated land use. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10:1063907. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1063907en_US
dcterms.extent1063907en_US
dcterms.issued2022-11-22en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dcterms.subjectsoil functionsen_US
dcterms.subjectsoilen_US
dcterms.subjectland useen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystem managementen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystemsen_US
dcterms.subjectnutrientsen_US
dcterms.subjectwateren_US
dcterms.subjectcarbonen_US
dcterms.subjectbiodiversityen_US
dcterms.subjectsoil analysisen_US
dcterms.subjectdecision makingen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationChina University of Geosciencesen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Spainen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversidad Politécnica de Madriden_US
cg.contributor.affiliationTechnology innovation center of land engineeringen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationKey Laboratory of Land Consolidationen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1063907en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAsiaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryChinaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2CNen_US
cg.contributor.donorNatural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
cg.contributor.donorCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.contributor.donorNational Key R&D Program of Chinaen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalFrontiers in Environmental Scienceen_US
cg.issn2296-665Xen_US
cg.volume10en_US
cg.subject.actionAreaSystems Transformationen_US
cg.contributor.initiativeLow-Emission Food Systemsen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record