Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChea, Rortanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSinh Dang-Xuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorHung Nguyen-Vieten_US
dc.contributor.authorUnger, Freden_US
dc.contributor.authorLindahl, Johanna F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTum, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTy, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Deliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorOsbjer, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBoqvist, Sofiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-23T10:03:23Zen_US
dc.date.available2022-12-23T10:03:23Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/126280en_US
dc.titleQuantitative risk assessment of salmonellosis in Cambodian consumers through chicken and pork salad consumptionen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractSalmonella is a globally important foodborne bacterial pathogen that poses a high risk to human health. This study aimed to estimate the risk to Cambodian consumers from acquiring salmonellosis after consuming chicken and pork salad, using a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). Chicken and pork salads are typical Cambodian dishes containing raw vegetables and boiled chicken meat or pork. As previously described, chicken meat and pork samples (n = 204 of each) were collected from traditional markets in 25 Cambodian provinces to generate data on Salmonella contamination. Salad preparation and consumption practices were surveyed in 93 Cambodian households and this information was used to design an experiment to assess Salmonella cross-contamination from raw meat to ready-to-eat salad. In the part of the study reported here, data on consumption, Salmonella in salad, dose-response, and predicted salmonellosis were modeled using Monte Carlo simulations at 10,000 iterations. The prevalence of Salmonella in chicken meat and pork were set to 42.6 and 45.1%, respectively, with average most probable number (MPN) per gram of Salmonella in chicken meat was 10.6 and in pork 11.1 MPN/g, based on an earlier study. Half of the interviewed households cooked meat for the salad directly after purchase. The QMRA model showed that the modeled annual risk of salmonellosis from consuming chicken salad, pork salad and both chicken and pork salad were 11.1% probability of illness per person per year (90% CI 0.0–35.1), 4.0% (90% CI 0.0–21.3), and 14.5% (90% CI 0.0–33.5), respectively. The factors most influencing the estimate were cross-contamination while preparing the salad, followed by the prevalence of Salmonella in chicken meat and pork at the market. The wide confidence interval for the incidence was mainly due to the variability in reducing bacteria concentration by cooking and salad consumption. The predicted risk of salmonellosis due to chicken and pork salad consumption is high, and the study provides evidence supporting control measures of improving the safety of retailed chicken and pork obtained from markets to households and improving food preparation methods in the household.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceAcademicsen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChea, R., Sinh Dang-Xuan, Hung Nguyen-Viet, Unger, F., Lindahl, J.F., Tum, S., Ty, C., Grace, D., Osbjer, K. and Boqvist, S. 2022. Quantitative risk assessment of salmonellosis in Cambodian consumers through chicken and pork salad consumption. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 6: 1059235.en_US
dcterms.extent1059235en_US
dcterms.issued2022-12-22en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dcterms.subjectfood safetyen_US
dcterms.subjectanimal productsen_US
dcterms.subjectchicken meaten_US
dcterms.subjectvegetablesen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.subject.ilriANIMAL PRODUCTSen_US
cg.subject.ilriFOOD SAFETYen_US
cg.subject.ilriMEATen_US
cg.subject.ilriPOULTRYen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationNational Animal Health and Production Research Institute, Cambodiaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationSwedish University of Agricultural Sciencesen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUppsala Universityen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationLivestock Development for Community Livelihood, Cambodiaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Greenwichen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nationsen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutionsen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1059235en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAsiaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryCambodiaen_US
cg.contributor.crpAgriculture for Nutrition and Healthen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KHen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaNutrition, health and food securityen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 2 - Zero hungeren_US
cg.creator.identifierRortana Chea: 0000-0002-3063-6398en_US
cg.creator.identifierSinh Dang-Xuan: 0000-0002-0522-7808en_US
cg.creator.identifierHung Nguyen-Viet: 0000-0003-1549-2733en_US
cg.creator.identifierJohanna Lindahl: 0000-0002-1175-0398en_US
cg.creator.identifierDelia Grace: 0000-0002-0195-9489en_US
cg.contributor.donorUnited States Agency for International Developmenten_US
cg.contributor.donorCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systemsen_US
cg.issn2571-581Xen_US
cg.volume6en_US
cg.subject.actionAreaResilient Agrifood Systemsen_US
cg.contributor.initiativeOne Healthen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record