Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeli, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchweizer, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWinowiecki, L.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChomba, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAynekulu, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGuariguata, M.R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T02:08:37Zen_US
dc.date.available2023-01-24T02:08:37Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/127938en_US
dc.titleMapping the information landscape of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Strategyen_US
dcterms.abstractThe strategy of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration identifies three pathways for action for overcoming six global barriers thought to hamper upscaling. We evaluated 6,023 peer-reviewed and gray literature papers published over the last two decades to map the information landscape underlying the barriers and associated pathways for action across world regions, terrestrial ecosystem types, restorative interventions and their outcomes. Overall, the literature addressed more the financial and legislative barriers than the technical and research-related ones, supporting the view that social, economic and political factors hamper scaling up ecosystem restoration. Latin America, Africa, and North America were the most prominent regions in the literature, yet differed in the number of publications addressing each barrier. An overwhelming number of publications focused on forests (78%), while grasslands (6%), drylands (3%), and mangroves (2%) received less attention. Across the three pathways for action, the action lines on (1) promoting long-term ecosystem restoration actions and monitoring and (2) education on restoration were the most underrepresented in the literature. In general, restorative interventions assessed rendered positive outcomes except those of a political, legislative or financial nature which reported negative or inconclusive outcomes. Our indicative assessment reveals critical information gaps on barriers, pathways, and types of restorative interventions across world regions, particularly related to specific social issues such as education for ecosystem restoration. Finally, we call for refining “strength of evidence” assessment frameworks that can systematically appraise, synthesize and integrate information on traditional and practitioner knowledge as two essential components for improving decision-making in ecosystem restoration.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.available2022-10-23en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMeli, P., Schweizer, D., Winowiecki, L.A., Chomba, S., Aynekulu, E. and Guariguata, M.R. (2022), Mapping the information landscape of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Strategy. Restoration Ecololgy, e13810. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13810en_US
dcterms.extente13810en_US
dcterms.issued2023-01en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherWileyen_US
dcterms.subjectecological restorationen_US
dcterms.subjectlandscape conservationen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystem managementen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationCenter for International Forestry Researchen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationWorld Agroforestry Centreen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13810en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalRestoration Ecololgyen_US
cg.issn1526-100Xen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record