Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAbang, A.F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNanga, S.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNdanda, R.M.O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDoumtsop Fotio, A.R.P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGonder, M.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKouebou, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSuh, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFotso Kuate, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFiaboe, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHanna, R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-06T15:28:26Zen_US
dc.date.available2023-02-06T15:28:26Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/128473en_US
dc.titleReliability of pheromone trap catches and maize plant damage as criteria for timing fall armyworm control interventions in humid forest agroecology of central Africaen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaAGRONOMYen_US
cg.subject.iitaFOOD SECURITYen_US
cg.subject.iitaMAIZEen_US
cg.subject.iitaPESTS OF PLANTSen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT BREEDINGen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT HEALTHen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT PRODUCTIONen_US
dcterms.abstractControl of fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) since its invasion of Africa still depends on pesticides. Early detection of adults is considered the key to the success of larvae control in the crop field. However, FAW control thresholds based on current monitoring techniques are not well established in Africa. We investigated the efficacy of moth capture frequencies and FAW incidence levels as decision tools for FAW management. Experiments were conducted over two maize cropping seasons during which FAW incidence, severity, and larvae count were recorded during destructive sampling after the application of a homologated insecticide. During the first season, the FAW incidence ranged from 37.5 ± 5.6% in the 25% incidence threshold treatment to 48.1 ± 8.1% in the control. During the second season, the incidence was significantly lower in the 25% incidence threshold treatment (55.8 ± 5.7%) compared with the control (75.7 ± 3.0%). Over the two seasons, no significant difference in FAW damage severity was recorded between the treatments and control. The highest number of larvae per plant (4.0 ± 0.6) was observed in the 10% incidence threshold treatment. Insecticide application did not consistently contribute to reducing FAW incidence and observed plant damage did not translate into yield loss. FAW control needs further investigation to establish a threshold above which damage translates into yield loss, thus necessitating control intervention.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.available2022-12-14en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAbang, A.F., Nanga, S.N., Esi Ndanda, R.M., Doumtsop Fotio, A.R., Gonder, M.K., Kouebou, C., ... & Hanna, R. (2022). Reliability of pheromone trap catches and maize plant damage as criteria for timing fall armyworm control interventions in humid forest agroecology of central Africa. Journal of Economic Entomology, 115(6), 1806-1816.en_US
dcterms.extent1806-1816en_US
dcterms.issued2022-12-14en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_US
dcterms.subjectspodoptera frugiperdaen_US
dcterms.subjectmaizeen_US
dcterms.subjectyieldsen_US
dcterms.subjectpests of plantsen_US
dcterms.subjectinsecticidesen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationNational University of Equatorial Guineaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Marouaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationDrexel Universityen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationBioko Biodiversity Protection Program, Equatorial Guineaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Agricultural Research for Development, Cameroonen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Californiaen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toac087en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionWest and Central Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionMiddle Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryCameroonen_US
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananasen_US
cg.identifier.iitathemeNATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENTen_US
cg.identifier.iitathemePLANT PRODUCTION & HEALTHen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2CMen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaNutrition, health and food securityen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 2 - Zero hungeren_US
cg.creator.identifierAlbert ABANG: 0000-0002-2791-9557en_US
cg.creator.identifierSamuel Nanga Nanga: 0000-0003-4281-8284en_US
cg.creator.identifierArmand Rodrigue Pascal Doumtsop Fotio: 0000-0001-7070-8440en_US
cg.creator.identifierFotso Kuate, A.: 0000-0002-5247-7519en_US
cg.creator.identifierKomi Fiaboe: 0000-0001-5113-2159en_US
cg.creator.identifierRachid Hanna: 0000-0002-5715-0144en_US
cg.contributor.donorWorld Banken_US
cg.contributor.donorCameroonian Governmenten_US
cg.contributor.donorCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalJournal of Economic Entomologyen_US
cg.issn0022-0493en_US
cg.volume115en_US
cg.issue6en_US
cg.contributor.initiativePlant Healthen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record