Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMengele, I.J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShirima, G.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBronsvoort, B.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHernandez-Castro, L.E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCook, Elizabeth A.J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-10T07:02:13Zen_US
dc.date.available2023-02-10T07:02:13Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/128634en_US
dc.titleDiagnostic challenges of brucellosis in humans and livestock in Tanzania: A thematic reviewen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractBrucellosis is an endemic bacterial zoonosis in Tanzania, and is among the most prioritized zoonotic diseases in the country. Brucellosis affects public health and livestock production in developing countries. Most human and livestock cases are not detected by the existing surveillance systems resulting in significant underestimation of the disease burden, and poor management of human cases by using nonspecific antibiotics may potentially contribute to antimicrobial resistance. To quantify the factors related to underreporting and those associated with the challenges in the diagnosis of brucellosis in Tanzania, search terms including “Brucella” “diagnosis” and “challenges” were used to query in Google search engine and publisher databases such as MEDLINE, PUBMED, NCBI, Springer, Hindawi, and Elsevier. The search parameters were limited to publications between 1995 and 2020. The searches returned 319 publications and grey articles which were screened and 57 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Four main areas were identified that cause underreporting of brucellosis and hinder brucellosis diagnosis: (1) inadequate knowledge of brucellosis among stakeholders in the livestock value chain, (2) limited diagnostic capacity for brucellosis due to unawareness of diagnostic tests and lack of epidemiological background of brucellosis among human and livestock health service workers (3) challenges associated with diagnostic tests, which include unreliable availability of diagnostic tests and unskilled workers, and (4) the uneven distribution of brucellosis surveillance studies in the country. This study suggests that there is a need for (1) training on public health education and brucellosis awareness among stakeholders in the livestock value chain; (2) providing scheduled continuing professional education with regard to brucellosis and other zoonotic diseases to health and livestock workers; (3) future brucellosis surveillance studies must focus on unrepresented regions; and (4) lastly, we recommend that the rose Bengal plate test (RBPT) and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) should be considered in brucellosis diagnostic schemes as a complementary tool to hasten the implementation of an ongoing national strategy for the prevention and control of brucellosis in humans and livestock in Tanzania. We suggest that these recommendations be considered for inclusion in the national strategy for brucellosis control in Tanzania.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceAcademicsen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMengele, I.J., Shirima, G.M., Bronsvoort, B.M., Hernandez-Castro, L.E. and Cook, E.A.J. 2023. Diagnostic challenges of brucellosis in humans and livestock in Tanzania: A thematic review. CABI One Health 2023(2023).en_US
dcterms.issued2023-01-13en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherCABI Publishingen_US
dcterms.subjectbrucellosisen_US
dcterms.subjectanimal healthen_US
dcterms.subjecthealthen_US
dcterms.subjectlivestocken_US
dcterms.subjectzoonosesen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.subject.ilriANIMAL HEALTHen_US
cg.subject.ilriBRUCELLOSISen_US
cg.subject.ilriHUMAN HEALTHen_US
cg.subject.ilriLIVESTOCKen_US
cg.subject.ilriZOONOTIC DISEASESen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technologyen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationTanzania Veterinary Laboratory Agencyen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Edinburghen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1079/cabionehealth.2023.0001en_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryTanzaniaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2TZen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaNutrition, health and food securityen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 3 - Good health and well-beingen_US
cg.creator.identifierElizabeth Cook: 0000-0001-6081-8363en_US
cg.creator.identifierIsaac Joseph Mengele: 0000-0002-4051-4079en_US
cg.creator.identifierGabriel Shirima: 0000-0001-7768-711Xen_US
cg.creator.identifierLuis Enrique Hernandez Castro: 0000-0002-2342-1655en_US
cg.contributor.donorBill & Melinda Gates Foundationen_US
cg.contributor.donorGovernment of the United Kingdomen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalCABI One Healthen_US
cg.issn2791-223Xen_US
cg.volume2023en_US
cg.issue2023en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record