CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Potato Center (CIP)
    • CIP Journal Articles
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Potato Center (CIP)
    • CIP Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Total iron absorbed from iron-biofortified potatoes is higher than from non-biofortified potatoes: a randomized trial using stable iron isotopes in women from the Peruvian highlands

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Burgos, G.
    Liria, R.
    Zeder, C.
    Kroon, P.A.
    Hareau, G.
    Penny, M.
    Dainty, J.
    Al-Jaibaji, O.
    Boy, E.
    Mithen, R.
    Hurrell, R.F.
    Salas, E.
    Zimmermann, M.
    Fairweather-Tait, S.
    Date Issued
    2023-04
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Burgos, G.; Liria, R.; Zeder, C.; Kroon, P.A.; Hareau, G.; Penny, M.; Dainty, J.; Al-Jaibaji, O.; Boy, E.; Mithen, R.; Hurrell, R.F.; Salas, E.; Zimmermann, M.; Fairweather-Tait, S. 2023.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/130029
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.04.010
    Abstract/Description
    Background Yellow fleshed potatoes biofortified with iron have been developed through conventional breeding but the bioavailability of the iron is unknown. Objectives Our objective was to measure iron absorption from an iron-biofortified yellow fleshed potato clone in comparison with a non-biofortified yellow fleshed potato variety. Methods We conducted a single-blinded, randomized, crossover, multiple-meal intervention study. Women (n = 28; mean±SD plasma ferritin 21.3±3.3 μg/L) consumed 10 meals (460 g) of both potatoes, each meal extrinsically labelled with either 58Fe sulfate (biofortified) or 57Fe sulfate (non-fortified) , on consecutive days. Iron absorption was estimated from the iron isotopic composition in erythrocytes 14 days after administration of the final meal. Results Mean±SD iron, phytic acid and ascorbic acid concentrations in the the iron-biofortified and the non-fortified potato meals (mg/per 100 mg) were 0.63±0.01 and 0.31±0.01 , 39.34±3.04 and 3.10±1.72 , and 7.65±0.34 and 3.74±0.39 , respectively (P < 0.01) while chlorogenic acid concentrations were 15.14±1.72 and 22.52±3.98 , respectively (P <0.05). Geometric mean (95% CI) fractional iron absorption (FIA) from the iron-biofortified clone and the non-biofortified variety was 12.1% (10.3-14.2%) and 16.6% (14.0-19.6%), respectively (P <0.001). Total iron absorption (TIA) from the iron-biofortified clone and the non-biofortified variety was 0.35 mg (0.30–0.41mg) and 0.24 mg (0.20–0.28 mg) per 460 g meal, respectively (P <0.001). Conclusions TIA from the iron-biofortified potato meals was 45.8% higher than from the non-biofortified potato meals, suggesting iron biofortification of potatoes through conventional breeding is a promising approach to improve iron intakes in iron-deficient women (p<0.01).
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Gabriela Burgos Zapatahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0268-6785
    Guy Gaston HAREAU ALGORTAhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8458-9259
    Elisa Salashttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-6920
    AGROVOC Keywords
    biofortification; potatoes; crops; iron; bioavailability; women; stable isotopes
    Subjects
    BIOFORTIFICATION; GENDER; POTATO AGRI-FOOD SYSTEMS; POTATOES;
    Countries
    Peru
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    International Potato Center; Instituto de Investigación Nutricional, Peru; ETH Zürich Laboratory of Human Nutrition; Quadram Institute, United Kingdom; University of East Anglia; International Food Policy Research Institute
    Investors/sponsors
    Global Challenges Research Fund
    Collections
    • CIP Journal Articles [1044]
    • CIP potato agri-food systems program [792]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback