Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurgos, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiria, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZeder, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKroon, P.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHareau, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPenny, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDainty, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAl-Jaibaji, O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBoy, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMithen, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHurrell, R.F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSalas, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZimmermann, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFairweather-Tait, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-17T17:39:39Zen_US
dc.date.available2023-04-17T17:39:39Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/130029en_US
dc.titleTotal iron absorbed from iron-biofortified potatoes is higher than from non-biofortified potatoes: a randomized trial using stable iron isotopes in women from the Peruvian highlandsen_US
cg.subject.cipBIOFORTIFICATIONen_US
cg.subject.cipGENDERen_US
cg.subject.cipPOTATO AGRI-FOOD SYSTEMSen_US
cg.subject.cipPOTATOESen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractBackground Yellow fleshed potatoes biofortified with iron have been developed through conventional breeding but the bioavailability of the iron is unknown. Objectives Our objective was to measure iron absorption from an iron-biofortified yellow fleshed potato clone in comparison with a non-biofortified yellow fleshed potato variety. Methods We conducted a single-blinded, randomized, crossover, multiple-meal intervention study. Women (n = 28; mean±SD plasma ferritin 21.3±3.3 μg/L) consumed 10 meals (460 g) of both potatoes, each meal extrinsically labelled with either 58Fe sulfate (biofortified) or 57Fe sulfate (non-fortified) , on consecutive days. Iron absorption was estimated from the iron isotopic composition in erythrocytes 14 days after administration of the final meal. Results Mean±SD iron, phytic acid and ascorbic acid concentrations in the the iron-biofortified and the non-fortified potato meals (mg/per 100 mg) were 0.63±0.01 and 0.31±0.01 , 39.34±3.04 and 3.10±1.72 , and 7.65±0.34 and 3.74±0.39 , respectively (P < 0.01) while chlorogenic acid concentrations were 15.14±1.72 and 22.52±3.98 , respectively (P <0.05). Geometric mean (95% CI) fractional iron absorption (FIA) from the iron-biofortified clone and the non-biofortified variety was 12.1% (10.3-14.2%) and 16.6% (14.0-19.6%), respectively (P <0.001). Total iron absorption (TIA) from the iron-biofortified clone and the non-biofortified variety was 0.35 mg (0.30–0.41mg) and 0.24 mg (0.20–0.28 mg) per 460 g meal, respectively (P <0.001). Conclusions TIA from the iron-biofortified potato meals was 45.8% higher than from the non-biofortified potato meals, suggesting iron biofortification of potatoes through conventional breeding is a promising approach to improve iron intakes in iron-deficient women (p<0.01).en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceAcademicsen_US
dcterms.audienceCGIARen_US
dcterms.audienceDevelopment Practitionersen_US
dcterms.audienceDonorsen_US
dcterms.audienceExtensionen_US
dcterms.audienceFarmersen_US
dcterms.audienceGeneral Publicen_US
dcterms.audienceNGOsen_US
dcterms.audiencePolicy Makersen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBurgos, G.; Liria, R.; Zeder, C.; Kroon, P.A.; Hareau, G.; Penny, M.; Dainty, J.; Al-Jaibaji, O.; Boy, E.; Mithen, R.; Hurrell, R.F.; Salas, E.; Zimmermann, M.; Fairweather-Tait, S. 2023.en_US
dcterms.issued2023-04-13en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.subjectbiofortificationen_US
dcterms.subjectpotatoesen_US
dcterms.subjectcropsen_US
dcterms.subjectironen_US
dcterms.subjectbioavailabilityen_US
dcterms.subjectwomenen_US
dcterms.subjectstable isotopesen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Potato Centeren_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Peruen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationETH Zürich Laboratory of Human Nutritionen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationQuadram Institute, United Kingdomen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of East Angliaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.04.010en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.countryPeruen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2PEen_US
cg.creator.identifierGabriela Burgos Zapata: 0000-0002-0268-6785en_US
cg.creator.identifierGuy Gaston HAREAU ALGORTA: 0000-0002-8458-9259en_US
cg.creator.identifierElisa Salas: 0000-0002-8247-6920en_US
cg.contributor.donorGlobal Challenges Research Funden_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedGrey Literatureen_US
cg.journalThe Journal of Nutritionen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record