CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
    • Alliance Bioversity CIAT Journal Articles
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
    • Alliance Bioversity CIAT Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    How can an agri-environmental scheme be designed for farmland bird protection, and what does it mean for the CAP 2023–2027?

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Buschmann_2023.pdf (605.0Kb)
    Authors
    Buschmann, Christoph
    Narjes, Manuel
    Röder, Norbert
    Date Issued
    2023-05
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Buschmann, C.; Narjes, M.; Röder, N. (2023) How can an agri-environmental scheme be designed for farmland bird protection, and what does it mean for the CAP 2023–2027? Journal for Nature Conservation 73: 126418. ISSN: 161:7-1381
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/130655
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126418
    Abstract/Description
    Biodiversity loss is recognized as a major global threat. The European Commission has addressed this issue with vigour in its current strategy papers. Farmland birds, such as the lapwing (Vanellus vanellus), whose population has been rapidly declining in Germany, have been particularly affected. To date, the European Union has tried to tackle the problem of biodiversity loss mainly with voluntary agri-environmental schemes (AESs), which are financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). However, only a small fraction of agricultural land is enrolled in such programs. We identify the possible drivers and inhibitors of farmers’ acceptance of a potential AES that, if introduced, could contribute to lapwing conservation. Our analysis is based on a discrete choice experiment conducted with 252 arable farmers in Germany. The results suggest that scheme attributes tied with EAFRD compliance, i.e., a minimum participation period of five years and the nature of the relevant sanctions regime, reduce farmers’ potential acceptance of the proposed AES. Furthermore, farmers and farm characteristics have an influence on preferences for specific AES attributes. Finally, this article outlines how the identified weaknesses of AES may be addressed in the new “Green Architecture” of the Common Agricultural Policy 2023–2027.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Manuel Ernesto Narjeshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3494-4408
    AGROVOC Keywords
    biodiversity; protection; nature conservation; agricultural policies; farmers; farmland; vanellus vanellus
    Subjects
    AGRICULTURE; BIODIVERSITY; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;
    Regions
    Europe
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    Thuenen Institute of Rural Studies; International Center for Tropical Agriculture; University of Hohenheim
    Collections
    • Alliance Bioversity CIAT Journal Articles [1100]
    • Alliance Research Lever 2: Multifunctional Landscapes [506]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback