CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI articles in journals
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI articles in journals
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An approach to the optimal allocation of conservation funds to minimize loss of genetic diversity between livestock breeds

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Simianer, H.
    Marti, S.
    Gibson, John P.
    Hanotte, Olivier H.
    Rege, J.E.O.
    Date Issued
    2003-07
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Simianer, H.; Marti, S.; Gibson, J.; Hanotte, O.; Rege, J.E.O. 2003. An approach to the optimal allocation of conservation funds to minimize loss of genetic diversity between livestock breeds. Ecological Economics 45(3):377-392.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/1559
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00092-2
    Abstract/Description
    About 30% of all farm animal breeds worldwide are at risk of extinction. To prevent this irreversible erosion of genetic diversity, the limited funds available for conservation need to be allocated in the most efficient way. Applying the diversity concept of Weitzman [Quart. J. Econ. CVII (1992) 363; Quart. J. Econ. CVIII (1993) 157] this paper presents a framework for the allocation of a given budget among a set of breeds such that the expected amount of between-breed diversity conserved is maximized. As a novel methodological contribution, a functional relationship between conservation funds spent in one population and the conservation effect in terms of reduced extinction probability is suggested. Based on arguments from population genetics, three different functions are derived, which may reflect the range of possible functions in typical conservation situations. The methodology is illustrated with an example of 23 African zebu and zenga cattle breeds. The results indicate that conservation funds should be spent on only three to nine of the 23 breeds, depending on the model used. Highest priority is given to breeds, for which the ‘conservation potential’, that is, the product of extinction probability and marginal diversity is maximum, and these are not necessarily the most endangered breeds. The methodology can be extended to the maximization of total utility, which incorporates diversity, as well as other direct use, and special value, characteristics. However, a number of essential input parameters such as extinction probabilities and economic values are lacking and realistic models for developing cost-efficient conservation strategies have to be derived. Given these lacking bits of information become available, the methodology suggested provides a breakthrough towards applicability of diversity-based approaches for decision taking in conservation programs.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    John Gibsonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-2401
    Olivier Hanottehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2877-4767
    AGROVOC Keywords
    genetics; animal breeding
    Subjects
    BIODIVERSITY; LIVESTOCK; INDIGENOUS BREEDS;
    Regions
    Africa
    Collections
    • AnGR Social and economic aspects [30]
    • AnGR Utilization [52]
    • ILRI articles in journals [6643]
    • ILRI livestock genetics program outputs [819]
    • Improving the Livelihoods of Livestock-keepers in Africa through Management of Indigenous Farm Animal Genetic Resources [19]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback