Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSunderlin, W.D.
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-04T09:02:20Z
dc.date.available2012-06-04T09:02:20Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.citationSunderlin, W.D. 1995. Global environment change, sociology, and paradigm isolation . Global Environmental Change 5 (3) :211-220.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/17682
dc.description.abstractThere are three broad categories of thought on how to respond to problems associated with global environmental change: structural economic change and grassroots mobilization; international diplomacy and regime building; and cultural/behavioural transformation. These categories of thought correspond to the classical paradigms of sociology –– that is, to the class, managerial, and pluralist perspectives. Many writings on global environmental change adhere to the tenets of one particular paradigm while ignoring, downplaying the significance of, or challenging the tenets of other paradigms. The article discusses the dangers of such compartmentalization and recommends that writers on global environmental change work to cross paradigm boundaries.
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourceGlobal Environmental Change
dc.subjectCLIMATE CHANGE
dc.subjectSOCIOLOGY
dc.titleGlobal environment change, sociology, and paradigm isolation
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.subject.ciforPOLICY AND EXTRASECTORAL ISSUES
cg.identifier.urlhttp://www.cifor.org/nc/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/11.html


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record