CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
    • CIFOR Archive
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
    • CIFOR Archive
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Research on logging: comparison of reduced-impact logging and conventional logging techniques

    Thumbnail
    
    Authors
    Kartawinata, K.
    Dwiprabowo, H.
    Sist, P.
    Date
    2002
    Language
    en
    Type
    Book Chapter
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    Citation
    Kartawinata, K., Dwiprabowo, H., Sist, P. 2002. Research on logging: comparison of reduced-impact logging and conventional logging techniques . In: CIFOR. ITTO project PD 12/97 Rev.1 (F): forest, science and sustainability: the Bulungan model forest: technical report phase 1, 1997-2001. :23-25. Bogor, Indonesia, CIFOR and ITTO.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18651
    External link to download this item: http://www.cifor.org/nc/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/1177.html
    Abstract/Description
    This chapter provides a brief overview of the reduced impact logging (RIL) as one of the main objectives of the first phase of the Bulungan research project. This activity was conducted in response to a question whether timber harvesting can be compatible with other forest services, values and functions. The main objective of RIL is to reduce soil disturbance, damage to residual trees and maintain future production of timber.
    AGROVOC Keywords
    LOGGING EFFECTS; REDUCTION; DAMAGE; PLANT RESIDUES; SOIL
    Subjects
    FOREST MANAGEMENT;
    Collections
    • CIFOR Archive [3513]

    AboutPrivacy PolicySend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy CPWF subjectBy CCAFS subjectBy CIFOR subjectBy IWMI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy CRP subjectBy River basinBy Output typeBy CTA subjectBy WLE subjectBy Bioversity subjectBy CIAT subjectBy CIP subjectBy animal breedBy CGIAR System subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy CPWF subjectBy CCAFS subjectBy CIFOR subjectBy IWMI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy CRP subjectBy River basinBy Output typeBy CTA subjectBy WLE subjectBy Bioversity subjectBy CIAT subjectBy CIP subjectBy animal breedBy CGIAR System subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy PolicySend Feedback