Options for a national REDD+ architecture
MetadataShow full item record
Vatn, A., Angelsen, A. 2009. Options for a national REDD+ architecture . In: Angelsen, A. with Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (eds). Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. :57-74. Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ISBN: 978-6-02-869303-5..
Permanent link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10568/20285
Key criteria for assessing different institutional options are their overall legitimacy and ability to produce 3E+ outcomes. Four major options for channelling (international) REDD+ finance are projects, funds – independent or within the state administration – and budget support. The mix of these depends crucially on national conditions and the choice of REDD+ actions. Building national REDD+ institutions takes time, and early design might constrain later options. Countries must therefore ensure that the immediate steps taken fit future and more developed solutions.
- CIFOR Archive