CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
    • CIFOR publications
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
    • CIFOR publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Visual detection based distance sampling offers efficient density estimation for distinctive low abundance tropical forest tree species in complex terrain

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Kissa, D.O.
    Sheil, D.
    Date Issued
    2012-01
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Kissa, D.O., Sheil, D. 2012. Visual detection based distance sampling offers efficient density estimation for distinctive low abundance tropical forest tree species in complex terrain. Forest Ecology and Management 263 (1):114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.020
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20926
    External link to download this item: https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/3599
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.020
    Abstract/Description
    Good density estimates for low abundance tree species are costly to achieve especially in rugged or disturbed forest landscapes. More efficient methods would be of considerable value to managers and conservationists. Here we assess a method that has been neglected in this context. We examine and compare distance-based visual detection line-transects and conventional fixed-width transects for assessing a distinctive low abundance species of conservation significance, Myrianthus holstii Engl., in three separate areas, within a steep, disturbed mountain rain forest. Precision and implied accuracy appeared substantially better with the visual detection line-transect than with the fixed-width transect for equivalent costs and effort at all three landscapes but as the two methods provide different estimates there are questions of possible bias in both approaches. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the distance approach and suggest some recommendations concerning its application. We conclude that the distance method is suited to low density species that are easily identified, even when understorey vegetation and terrain severely impair visibility. However, due to the differences in detection probabilities, populations need to be stratified both by tree size and context.
    AGROVOC Keywords
    biodiversity; tropical forests; sampling; inventories
    Subjects
    BIODIVERSITY;
    Collections
    • CIFOR publications [7743]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback