CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI articles in journals
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI articles in journals
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The introduction of animal traction into inland valley regions. 1. Manual labour and animal traction in the cultivation of rice and maize: A comparison

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Lawrence, P.R.
    Dijkman, J.T.
    Jansen, G.P.
    Date Issued
    1997
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Lawrence, P.R., Dijkman, J.T. and Jansen, G.P. 1997. The introduction of animal traction into inland valley regions. 1. Manual labour and animal traction in the cultivation of rice and maize: A comparison. The Journal of Agricultural Science 129(1):65-70.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/3008
    External link to download this item: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=6863&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0021859697004516
    Abstract/Description
    Rice, a cash crop, was grown in the alluvial valley bottom (fadama) of an inland valley region of central Nigeria. The main staple crop, maize, was grown on the adjacent upland areas. Both oxen and manual labour were used for initial cultivation (ploughing and harrowing for rice and ridging for maize). Times spent were 94•3 and 315•2 h/ha respectively for rice and 28•2 and 65•5 h/ha for maize. Plots cultivated by animal traction (AT) produced more weeds and required more time for weeding than manually cultivated ones. Thus although animal traction saved time at the most critical time of year, it did not save time overall. Total time values were 1045 and 1064 h/ha for rice using animal traction and manual cultivation respectively. Corresponding values for maize were 654 and 484 h/ha. Type of cultivation had no significant effect (P > 0•05) on yields of crops (4•50 and 4•55 t/ha, AT/manual, for rice and 1•60 and 1•83 t/ha for maize). Not weeding the plots reduced rice yields to 2•78 and 2•83 t/ha for ox and manual cultivation respectively and to virtually zero for maize.
    AGROVOC Keywords
    cash crops; rice
    Subjects
    CROPS; FARMING SYSTEMS; LIVESTOCK;
    Countries
    Nigeria
    Regions
    Africa; Western Africa
    Collections
    • ILRI articles in journals [6643]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback