CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI archive
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI archive
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Urine effects on soil chemical properties and the impact of urine and dung on pearl millet yield

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Powell, J.M.
    Ikpe, F.N.
    Somda, Z.C.
    Fernández Rivera, S.
    Date Issued
    1998-07
    Date Online
    2001-03
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Experimental Agriculture;34(3): 259-276
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/32910
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479798343069
    Abstract/Description
    Most farming systems in semi-arid West Africa rely on organic matter recycling for maintaining soil fertility. The cycling of biomass through ruminant livestock into dung (faeces) and urine that fertilize the soil has long been an important factor in the nutrient cycling processes of these integrated, mixed crop/livestock systems. While dung greatly improves soil properties and crop yields, little is known about the effects of urine on soil chemical properties and the impact of dung and urine on crop production. An average voiding of sheep urine applied to a sandy, siliceous soil in the Republic of Niger increased soil pH, available phosphorus and ammonium levels dramatically in the upper 10-15 cm of soil, especially during the first week following application. Losses of applied urine nitrogen via volatilization were in the order of 30-50 percent. A four-year field trial was conducted on the same soil type to evaluate the effects on pearl millet and weed yields of corralling cattle or sheep overnight on cropland (dung plus urine applicaiton) for one, two or three nights, every one, two or three years versus the effects of applying only dung at the same application rates and intervals achieved with corralling. The main results of this field trial were that (1) urine had large positive effects on millet grain, threshed panicle, leaf, stem and weed yields, (2) sheep dung was more effective than cattle dung in increasing yield, (3) two nights of dung application was adequate for maximum yield and (4) the positive effects of dung and urine on yield lasted two to three cropping seasons after application.
    AGROVOC Keywords
    pennisetum glaucum; yields; urine; soil chemicophysical properties; farmyard manure
    Subjects
    SOILS; FEEDS; LIVESTOCK;
    Collections
    • ILRI archive [4978]
    • ILRI articles in journals [6643]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback