Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPowell, J.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIkpe, F.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSomda, Z.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández Rivera, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-03T05:25:44Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-07-03T05:25:44Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/32910en_US
dc.titleUrine effects on soil chemical properties and the impact of urine and dung on pearl millet yielden_US
dcterms.abstractMost farming systems in semi-arid West Africa rely on organic matter recycling for maintaining soil fertility. The cycling of biomass through ruminant livestock into dung (faeces) and urine that fertilize the soil has long been an important factor in the nutrient cycling processes of these integrated, mixed crop/livestock systems. While dung greatly improves soil properties and crop yields, little is known about the effects of urine on soil chemical properties and the impact of dung and urine on crop production. An average voiding of sheep urine applied to a sandy, siliceous soil in the Republic of Niger increased soil pH, available phosphorus and ammonium levels dramatically in the upper 10-15 cm of soil, especially during the first week following application. Losses of applied urine nitrogen via volatilization were in the order of 30-50 percent. A four-year field trial was conducted on the same soil type to evaluate the effects on pearl millet and weed yields of corralling cattle or sheep overnight on cropland (dung plus urine applicaiton) for one, two or three nights, every one, two or three years versus the effects of applying only dung at the same application rates and intervals achieved with corralling. The main results of this field trial were that (1) urine had large positive effects on millet grain, threshed panicle, leaf, stem and weed yields, (2) sheep dung was more effective than cattle dung in increasing yield, (3) two nights of dung application was adequate for maximum yield and (4) the positive effects of dung and urine on yield lasted two to three cropping seasons after application.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.available2001-03-30en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationExperimental Agriculture;34(3): 259-276en_US
dcterms.extentp. 259-276en_US
dcterms.issued1998-07en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_US
dcterms.subjectpennisetum glaucumen_US
dcterms.subjectyieldsen_US
dcterms.subjecturineen_US
dcterms.subjectsoil chemicophysical propertiesen_US
dcterms.subjectfarmyard manureen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.subject.ilriSOILSen_US
cg.subject.ilriFEEDSen_US
cg.subject.ilriLIVESTOCKen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479798343069en_US
cg.journalExperimental Agricultureen_US
cg.issn0014-4797en_US
cg.volume34en_US
cg.issue3en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record