Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEba, Bedasaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHaileslassie, Amareen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnimut, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Alan J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeden, Donald G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-14T14:56:04Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-12-14T14:56:04Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/34254en_US
dc.titleEffects of livestock feed sourcing and feeding strategies on livestock water productivity in mixed crop–livestock systems of the Blue Nile basin highlands of Ethiopiaen_US
dcterms.abstractInefficient management and use of water is unanimously the most single constraint of agricultural production of Ethiopia. The study was conducted to assess the effect of livestock feed sourcing and feeding strategies on livestock water productivity (LWP) in mixed crop–livestock production systems of the Blue Nile Basin in Ethiopian Highlands. Three districts representing diverse agricultural farming systems were considered. Each district further stratified to different farming systems. Multi-stage stratified random sampling technique was employed to select farm households. Household survey, group discussions and plant biomass sampling were done to generate data on beneficial outputs, water depleted and feed sourcing and feeding strategies. LWP was estimated as a ratio of livestock’s beneficial outputs and services to depleted water. The results indicated that the major feed sources were mainly from crop residues (58.5 to 78.2%), natural pasture (10.9 to 33.4%) and aftermath grazing (9.9 to 24.3%) in study farming systems. The feed source from energy dense (improved forages) was low. The feeding strategies were relatively similar among the study farming systems. No apparent difference (P>0.05) was observed in LWP within all districts among the farming systems and the value falls between USD 0.15–0.19 m-3. However, LWP difference was observed within clustered wealth status within all farming systems and lower value of LWP general observed for the poor farm households. Such differences of LWP values can be accounted for by the strategies farm households are following in feed sourcing and how water productive those feed sources are. Hence, in the context of this work, options to improve LWP mainly involve sourcing water productive and higher quality feed.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEba, B., Hialeslassie, A., Animut, G., Duncan, A.J. and Peden, D. 2013. Effects of livestock feed sourcing and feeding strategies on livestock water productivity in mixed crop–livestock systems of the Blue Nile basin highlands of Ethiopia. IN: Wolde, M. (ed). 2013, Rainwater management for resilient livelihoods in Ethiopia: Proceedings of the Nile Basin Development Challenge Science Meeting, Addis Ababa, 9–10 July 2013. NBDC Technical Report 5. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.en_US
dcterms.isPartOfNBDC Technical Reporten_US
dcterms.issued2013-11-01en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherInternational Livestock Research Instituteen_US
dcterms.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/33929en_US
dcterms.subjectlivestocken_US
dcterms.subjectwateren_US
dcterms.typeBook Chapteren_US
cg.subject.ilriANIMAL FEEDINGen_US
cg.subject.ilriCROP-LIVESTOCKen_US
cg.subject.ilriLIVESTOCK-WATERen_US
cg.subject.ilriWATERen_US
cg.subject.ilriRANGELANDSen_US
cg.river.basinNILEen_US
cg.subject.cpwfFARMING SYSTEMSen_US
cg.subject.cpwfLIVESTOCK-WATERen_US
cg.subject.cpwfWATER PRODUCTIVITYen_US
cg.subject.cpwfWATER USEen_US
cg.placeNairobi, Kenyaen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryEthiopiaen_US
cg.contributor.crpWater, Land and Ecosystemsen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ETen_US
cg.creator.identifierAlan Duncan: 0000-0002-3954-3067en_US
cg.creator.identifierAmare Haileslassie: 0000-0001-5237-9006en_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.number5en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record