CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Water Management Institute (IWMI)
    • IWMI Conference Chapters or Papers
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Water Management Institute (IWMI)
    • IWMI Conference Chapters or Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Application of models with different types of modelling methodologies for river flow forecasting

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Hapuarachchi, H. A. P.
    Zhijia, L.
    Flugel, Albert Wolfgang
    Date Issued
    2003
    Language
    en
    Type
    Conference Paper
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Hapuarachchi, H. A. P.; Zhijia, L.; Flugel, Albert Wolfgang. 2003. Application of models with different types of modelling methodologies for river flow forecasting. Tachikawa, Y.; Vieux, B. E.; Georgakakos, K. P.; Nakakita, E. (Eds.). Weather Radar Information and Distributed Hydrological Modelling: proceedings of Symposium HS03 held during IUGG2003 at Sapporo, Japan, 30 June-11 July 2003. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) pp.218-226. (IAHS Publication 282)
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/38476
    Abstract/Description
    In the present study, a conceptual watershed model, a distributed watershed model, and an artificial neural network (ANN) have been applied to river flow forecasting in the Kalu River upper catchment in Sri Lanka. The Xinanjiang watershed model has been used as a conceptual watershed model and the SWAT model (Neitsch, 2000) has been used with spatial data as a distributed model. Two types of ANN architectures, namely multi-layer perceptron network (MLP) and radial basis function network (RBF) have been implemented as "black box" type modelling methodology. Based on the application results, it seems that the conceptual watershed model could perform slightly better than the distributed model and the ANN for this watershed. It was clearly noted that the performance of distributed models strictly depends on the quality of input data (Arnold et al., 1998) whereas the performance of conceptual models depends on the calibration (Duan et al., 1992, 1993).
    Notes
    Tachikawa, Y.; Vieux, B. E.; Georgakakos, K. P.; Nakakita, E. (Eds.). Weather Radar Information and Distributed Hydrological Modelling: proceedings of Symposium HS03 held during IUGG2003 at Sapporo, Japan, 30 June-11 July 2003. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS)
     
    IAHS Publication 282
     
    AGROVOC Keywords
    rivers; flow; forecasting; watersheds; catchment areas; models; networks
    Countries
    Sri Lanka
    Regions
    South-eastern Asia; Southern Asia
    Collections
    • IWMI Conference Chapters or Papers [1045]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback