Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlauddin, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Bharat R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-13T14:47:15Zen_US
dc.date.available2014-06-13T14:47:15Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/40248en_US
dc.titleInter-district rice water productivity differences in Bangladesh: an empirical exploration and implicationsen_US
dcterms.abstractWhile the bulk of research on crop water productivity (WP) focuses on static cross-section analysis, this research provides a spatio-temporal perspective. It estimates rice crop WP for 21 Bangladesh districts for 37 years; exploresWP variations among districts; and investigates causality involving WP, intensification and technological variables; and groundwater irrigation and depth. It breaks new grounds by probing these significant but unexplored issues. Technological diffusion was the key factor explaining inter-district WP differences. The impact of agricultural intensification on rabi (dry season) and kharif (wet season) crop WPs was positive and negative respectively. Dummy variables typifying policy transition negatively impacted on WPs for both kharif and overall crops. While rabi and kharif rice WPs grew with time, overall crop WP recorded the strongest growth. Rabi and overall WPs were lower in salinity- and drought-prone districts covering 33% of Bangladesh's net cropped area (NCA). In 90% of Bangladesh's NCA districts, technological diffusion caused WP. Causality existed between groundwater irrigation and depth in 60% NCA. Despite significant potential to increaseWP, increasing dependence on groundwater appears unsustainable. Widespread diffusion of HYVs in the kharif season, and development of salinity and drought-tolerant rice varieties could go a long way in sustaining rice WP.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAlauddin, M.; Sharma, Bharat R. 2013. Inter-district rice water productivity differences in Bangladesh: an empirical exploration and implications. Ecological Economics, 93:210-218. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.015en_US
dcterms.issued2013-09en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dcterms.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dcterms.subjectwater productivityen_US
dcterms.subjectcropsen_US
dcterms.subjectriceen_US
dcterms.subjectintensificationen_US
dcterms.subjectindicatorsen_US
dcterms.subjecttechnologyen_US
dcterms.subjectgroundwater irrigationen_US
dcterms.subjectirrigated sitesen_US
dcterms.subjectland productivityen_US
dcterms.subjectdroughten_US
dcterms.subjectsalinityen_US
dcterms.subjectpolicyen_US
dcterms.subjectfactor analysisen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Water Management Instituteen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.015en_US
cg.coverage.regionAsiaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryBangladeshen_US
cg.contributor.crpWater, Land and Ecosystemsen_US
cg.identifier.wlethemeManaging Resource Variability and Competing Useen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2BDen_US
cg.issn0921-8009en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record