Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Robyn M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCools, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiersch, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorardet, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMurgue, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMahieu, Marieen_US
dc.contributor.authorZsuffa, I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorUyttendaele, G.P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-13T14:47:17Zen_US
dc.date.available2014-06-13T14:47:17Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/40271en_US
dc.titleWETwin: a structured approach to evaluating wetland management options in data-poor contextsen_US
dcterms.abstractThis special issue of Environmental Science and Policy presents the outcomes of the WETwin project (enhancing the role of wetlands in integrated water resources management for twinned river basins in EU, Africa and South-America in support of EU Water Initiatives), an international research project funded by the FP7 programme of the European Commission. The project aimed to improve wetland management by maximising benefits from wetland use while maintaining ecological health, using case studies from Europe, Africa and South America. In much of the less developed world, data on wetland functions, processes and values are scarce even while wetlands often provide a critical component of livelihoods. Management decisions on balancing competing demands for wetland use must often be made in the absence of comprehensive information. This paper introduces the approach developed and tested under WETwin to evaluate wetland management structures and solutions in datapoor contexts, summarising a conceptual framework which has evolved from seven very diverse case studies. A structured, modular approach was devised which combined multi-criteria analysis, trade-off analysis and vulnerability analysis, drawing on best available information, including quantitative modelling, qualitative ''expert opinion'', and local stakeholders' knowledge and values. The approach used in WETwin has three important strengths: it involves stakeholders at all stages of the decision process, it combines qualitative and quantitative data (and therefore allows inclusion of poorly known and potentially important system components) and finally, it provides a relatively simple and structured approach to evaluate wetland management interventions and integrate impact, feasibility and institutional assessments, vulnerability analysis and trade-off analysis. The overall conceptual framework developed for WETwin was found to be robust and transfer-able to different contexts.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJohnston, Robyn; Cools, J.; Liersch, S.; Morardet, S.; Murgue, C.; Mahieu, Marie; Zsuffa, I.; Uyttendaele, G. P. 2013. WETwin: a structured approach to evaluating wetland management options in data-poor contexts. Environmental Science and Policy, 34:3-17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.006en_US
dcterms.issued2013-12en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dcterms.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dcterms.subjectwater managementen_US
dcterms.subjectresearch projectsen_US
dcterms.subjectwetlandsen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystemsen_US
dcterms.subjectriver basin managementen_US
dcterms.subjectstakeholdersen_US
dcterms.subjectpublic participationen_US
dcterms.subjectcase studiesen_US
dcterms.subjectindicatorsen_US
dcterms.subjectanalytical methodsen_US
dcterms.subjecteuropean unionen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Water Management Instituteen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.006en_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouth Americaen_US
cg.contributor.crpWater, Land and Ecosystemsen_US
cg.identifier.wlethemeRegenerating Degraded Agricultural Ecosystemsen_US
cg.volume34en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record