Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Robyn M.
dc.contributor.authorCools, J.
dc.contributor.authorLiersch, S.
dc.contributor.authorMorardet, S.
dc.contributor.authorMurgue, C.
dc.contributor.authorMahieu, Marie
dc.contributor.authorZsuffa, I.
dc.contributor.authorUyttendaele, G. P.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-13T14:47:17Z
dc.date.available2014-06-13T14:47:17Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationJohnston, Robyn; Cools, J.; Liersch, S.; Morardet, S.; Murgue, C.; Mahieu, Marie; Zsuffa, I.; Uyttendaele, G. P. 2013. WETwin: a structured approach to evaluating wetland management options in data-poor contexts. Environmental Science and Policy, 34:3-17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/40271
dc.description.abstractThis special issue of Environmental Science and Policy presents the outcomes of the WETwin project (enhancing the role of wetlands in integrated water resources management for twinned river basins in EU, Africa and South-America in support of EU Water Initiatives), an international research project funded by the FP7 programme of the European Commission. The project aimed to improve wetland management by maximising benefits from wetland use while maintaining ecological health, using case studies from Europe, Africa and South America. In much of the less developed world, data on wetland functions, processes and values are scarce even while wetlands often provide a critical component of livelihoods. Management decisions on balancing competing demands for wetland use must often be made in the absence of comprehensive information. This paper introduces the approach developed and tested under WETwin to evaluate wetland management structures and solutions in datapoor contexts, summarising a conceptual framework which has evolved from seven very diverse case studies. A structured, modular approach was devised which combined multi-criteria analysis, trade-off analysis and vulnerability analysis, drawing on best available information, including quantitative modelling, qualitative ''expert opinion'', and local stakeholders' knowledge and values. The approach used in WETwin has three important strengths: it involves stakeholders at all stages of the decision process, it combines qualitative and quantitative data (and therefore allows inclusion of poorly known and potentially important system components) and finally, it provides a relatively simple and structured approach to evaluate wetland management interventions and integrate impact, feasibility and institutional assessments, vulnerability analysis and trade-off analysis. The overall conceptual framework developed for WETwin was found to be robust and transfer-able to different contexts.
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleWETwin: a structured approach to evaluating wetland management options in data-poor contexts
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.identifier.statusLimited Access
cg.subject.iwmiWATER MANAGEMENT
cg.subject.iwmiRESEARCH PROJECTS
cg.subject.iwmiWETLANDS
cg.subject.iwmiECOSYSTEMS
cg.subject.iwmiRIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT
cg.subject.iwmiSTAKEHOLDERS
cg.subject.iwmiPUBLIC PARTICIPATION
cg.subject.iwmiCASE STUDIES
cg.subject.iwmiINDICATORS
cg.subject.iwmiANALYTICAL METHODS
cg.subject.iwmiEUROPEAN UNION
cg.coverage.regionAFRICA
cg.coverage.regionSOUTH AMERICA
cg.contributor.crpWater, Land and Ecosystems
cg.identifier.wlethemeRegenerating Degraded Agricultural Ecosystems


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record