Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRebelo, Lisa-Maria
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Robyn M.
dc.contributor.authorHein, T.
dc.contributor.authorWeigelhofer, G.
dc.contributor.authorDHaeyer, T.
dc.contributor.authorKone, B.
dc.contributor.authorCools, J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-13T14:47:32Z
dc.date.available2014-06-13T14:47:32Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationRebelo, Lisa-Maria; Johnston, Robyn; Hein, T.; Weigelhofer, G.; DHaeyer, T.; Kone, B.; Cools, J. 2012. Challenges to the integration of wetlands into IWRM [Integrated Water Resources Management]: the case of the inner Niger Delta (Mali) and the Lobau Floodplain (Austria). Environmental Science and Policy, 34:58-68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/40384
dc.description.abstractWetlands are too often perceived as standalone elements and are poorly integrated into river basin management. The Ramsar Convention recognizes the critical linkage between wetlands, water and river basin management; the governments that are party to the Convention have committed to conserving their wetlands within a framework of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). The "Critical Path? approach and related guidance have been adopted by Contracting Parties of the Ramsar Convention in order to effectively integrate wetland conservation and management into river basin management planning and decision-making. However, despite international acceptance of the approach, it is not widely implemented. This paper provides one of the first case study based assessments of the Critical Path approach. The analysis of two contrasting Ramsar sites is presented in order to better understand the barriers to implementation in different development contexts. These are the Lobau wetland in Austria, where management institutions and regulatory frameworks are highly developed; and the Inner Niger Delta in Mali, where the capacity to implement IWRM is less evolved. A planning approach is proposed which involves structured and transparent methods for assessing ecosystem services and institutional capacity, and is suitable as a tool for identifying, prioritizing and negotiating trade-offs in ecosystem services and improving livelihoods. Based on the analysis, two main barriers to implementation are identified; mismatch between local and national or basin level priorities, and a lack of recognition of the ecosystem services provided by wetlands.
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleChallenges to the integration of wetlands into IWRM [Integrated Water Resources Management]: the case of the inner Niger Delta (Mali) and the Lobau Floodplain (Austria).
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.identifier.statusLimited Access
cg.river.basinNIGER
cg.subject.iwmiWETLANDS
cg.subject.iwmiWATER MANAGEMENT
cg.subject.iwmiDELTAS
cg.subject.iwmiFLOODPLAINS
cg.subject.iwmiECOSYSTEMS
cg.subject.iwmiRIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT
cg.subject.iwmiINSTITUTIONS
cg.subject.iwmiLEGAL ASPECTS
cg.coverage.regionWEST AFRICA
cg.coverage.countryMALI
cg.coverage.countryAUSTRIA
cg.contributor.crpWater, Land and Ecosystems
cg.coverage.subregionLOBAU FLOODPLAIN
cg.coverage.subregionLOBAU WETLAND


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record