CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
    • CIAT Articles in Journals
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
    • CIAT Articles in Journals
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Phaseolin type and heat treatment influence the biochemistry of protein digestion in the rat intestine

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Montoya Marmolejo, CA
    Leterme, P
    Beebe, Stephen E.
    Souffrant, WB
    Molle, D
    Lalles, JP
    Date Issued
    2008-03
    Date Online
    2008-03
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Montoya Marmolejo, Carlos Aníbal; Leterme, Pascal; Beebe, Stephen E.; Souffrant, Wolfgang B.; Mollé, Daniel; Lalles, Jean-Paul. 2008. Phaseolin type and heat treatment influence the biochemistry of protein digestion in the rat intestine . British Journal of Nutrition 99:531-539.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/43941
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114507819179
    Abstract/Description
    The study aimed to investigate the in vivo digestion of Phaseolus vulgaris phaseolin types differing in their subunit pattern composition. Diets contained either casein as the sole source of protein or a mixture (1:1) of casein and pure Sanilac (S), Tendergreen (T) or Inca (I) phaseolin either unheated or heated. Rats were fed for 11 d with the experimental diets. Their ileal content and mucosa were collected and prepared for electrophoresis, Western blotting, densitometry and MS. Differences in digestion among native phaseolin types were observed for intact phaseolin at molecular weights (MW) of 47 50·5 kDa and for an undigested fragment at MW of 19 21·5 kDa in ileal digesta. In both cases, the concentration of these protein bands was lower for I phaseolin than for S or T phaseolin (P < 0·05). In the mucosa, the concentration of a protein band at MW of 20·5 21·5 kDa was lower for S phaseolin as compared to T or I phaseolin (P < 0·001). The presence of phaseolin subunits and their fragments was confirmed by Western blotting. MS analysis revealed the presence of undigested ? and ? subunit fragments from phaseolin and endogenous proteins (anionic trypsin I and pancreatic ?-amylase) in ileal digesta. Thermal treatment improved digestion (P < 0·01), acting on both dietary and endogenous protein components. In conclusion, this study provides evidence for differences in intestinal digestion among phaseolin types, S phaseolin being more resistant and I phaseolin more susceptible. These differences were affected by the origin of the phaseolin subunit precursor. Heat treatment enhanced phaseolin digestion.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Stephen E Beebehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3742-9930
    AGROVOC Keywords
    phaseolus vulgaris; globulins; digestion; nutritive value; globulinas; digestión; valor nutritivo
    Subjects
    BEANS; NUTRITION;
    Collections
    • CIAT Articles in Journals [2636]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback