CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
    • CIAT Articles in Journals
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
    • CIAT Articles in Journals
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Socio-ecological niches for minimum tillage and crop-residue retention in continuous maize cropping systems in smallholder farms of central Kenya

    Thumbnail
    
    Authors
    Guto, SN
    Pypers, Pieter
    Vanlauwe, Bernard
    Ridder, N.A. de
    Giller, Ken E.
    Date
    2011
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer-reviewed
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10568/44106
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0359
    Abstract/Description
    Soil fertility gradients develop on smallholder farms due to preferential allocation of inputs. A multi-location on-farm trial was conducted in Meru South, Central Kenya whose overall aim was to test minimum tillage and crop-residue retention practices in socio-ecological niches across heterogeneous smallholder farms. We identified three soil fertility classes together with the farmers, namely: good, medium, and poor. In each soil fertility class, two tillage (minimum or regular) and two crop residue (removed or retained) practices were tested for four consecutive seasons. Maize (Zea mays L.) grain yields in the good fields were above 2.5 Mg ha?1 across cropping seasons and cumulated yields were not influenced by tillage or crop residue management. The grain yields in the medium fields ranged between 1.3 and 5.4 Mg ha?1 and were greater with crop residue retention. In the poor fields, grain yield was <3.6 Mg ha?1 and minimum tillage resulted in yield decrease while crop residue addition did not affect yields. Regular tillage and crop residue removal resulted in largest gross benefits in the good fields ($5376 ha?1) while in the medium fields, minimum tillage with residue retention was most profitable ($3214 ha?1). Retention of crop residues will give improved maize performance in the medium fields and the prevailing prices favor minimum tillage and crop residue retention. In the poor fields, the emphasis should be on the rehabilitation of soil physical and chemical attributes because none of the tillage and crop residue practices was profitable.
    AGROVOC Keywords
    TILLAGE; CROPPING SYSTEMS; SMALLHOLDER AGRICULTURE; MAIZE; ARADURA; SISTEMAS DE CULTIVO
    Subjects
    FARMING SYSTEMS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SOIL HEALTH;
    Countries
    KENYA
    Regions
    AFRICA; EAST AFRICA
    Collections
    • CIAT Articles in Journals [2248]

    AboutSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy CPWF subjectBy CCAFS subjectBy CIFOR subjectBy IWMI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy CRP subjectBy River basinBy Output typeBy CTA subjectBy WLE subjectBy Bioversity subjectBy CIAT subjectBy CIP subjectBy animal breedBy CGIAR System subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy CPWF subjectBy CCAFS subjectBy CIFOR subjectBy IWMI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy CRP subjectBy River basinBy Output typeBy CTA subjectBy WLE subjectBy Bioversity subjectBy CIAT subjectBy CIP subjectBy animal breedBy CGIAR System subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutSend Feedback