Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVanlauwe, Bernarden_US
dc.contributor.authorTittonell, Pablo A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMukulama, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-02T08:33:28Zen_US
dc.date.available2014-10-02T08:33:28Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/44233en_US
dc.titleWithin-farm soil fertility gradients affect response of maize to fertilizer application in Western Kenyaen_US
cg.subject.ciatSOIL HEALTHen_US
cg.subject.ciatSOIL INFORMATIONen_US
dcterms.abstractDifferent fields within a farm have been observed to have different soil fertility status and this may affect the response of a maize crop to applied N, P, and K fertiliser. A limiting nutrient trial was carried out at six farms each, in three districts of Western Kenya. In each of the farms, the following treatments were laid out in three fields with different soil fertility status at different distances from the homestead (close, mid-distance, remote fields): no inputs, application of NPK, NP, NK, or PK fertiliser (urea, triple super phosphate, KCl) to maize. Total soil N decreased at all sites with distance to the homestead (from 1.30 to 1.06 g kg?1), as did Olsen-P (from 10.5 to 2.3 mg kg?1). Grain yields in the no-input control plots reflected this decrease in soil fertility status with distance to the homestead (from 2.59 to 1.59 t ha?1). In the NPK treatments, however, this difference between field types disappeared (from 3.43 to 3.98 t ha?1), indicating that N and P are the major limiting nutrients in the target areas. Response to applied N was related to the soil total N content in Aludeka and Shinyalu, but not in Emuhaia, probably related to the high use of partially decomposed organic inputs with limited N availability. Consequently, response to applied N decreased with distance to the homestead in Aludeka (from 0.95 kg kg?1 relative yield to 0.55 kg kg?1) and Shinyalu (from 0.76 kg kg?1 to 0.47 kg kg?1), but not in Emuhaia (from 0.75 kg kg?1 to 0.68 kg kg?1). Response to applied P was related to the soil Olsen-P content at all sites. While for farms with a relatively high Olsen-P gradient, response to applied P decreased with distance to the homestead (from 0.99 kg kg?1 to 0.68 kg kg?1), large variability in Olsen-P gradients across field types among farms within a specific site often masked clear differences in response to P between field types for a specific site. Clear scope for field-specific fertiliser recommendations exists, provided these are based on local soil knowledge and diagnosis. Scenario analysis, using farm-scale modelling tools, could assist in determining optimum allocation strategies of scarcely available fertiliser for maximum fertiliser use efficiency.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.available2006-09-28en_US
dcterms.issued2007-02-20en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dcterms.subjectmaizeen_US
dcterms.subjectnpk fertilizersen_US
dcterms.subjectsoil fertilityen_US
dcterms.subjectmaízen_US
dcterms.subjectabonos npken_US
dcterms.subjectfertilidad del sueloen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-005-8314-1en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryKenyaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KEen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalNutrient Cycling in Agroecosystemsen_US
cg.issn1573-0867en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record