Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShiferaw, Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGirma, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJobre, Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHailemariam, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZerbini, E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-31T06:08:56Zen_US
dc.date.available2014-10-31T06:08:56Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/50219en_US
dc.titleBioassay of acaricide resistance on three common cattle tick species around Holetta areaen_US
dcterms.abstractBioassay of acaricide resistance on three common cattle tick species was conducted at the Institute of Agricultural Research, Holetta Research Centre by using standardized FAO Acaricide Resistance Test Methods. Larval progeny of Boophilus decoloratus, Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi and Amblyomma varigatum were subjected to larval packet test (LPT) employing four different acaricides namely, Dieldrin, Diazinon, Chlorefenvinphos and Coumpaphs, each with five concentration levels. Statistical assessment of pooled mortality rates (least square means (+ or -) standard error) to the tested acaricides were 67.93 (+ or -) 0.86 for B. decoloratus, 97.93 (+ or -) 0.86 for R. e.evertsi and 97.23 (+ or -) 0.86 for A. varigatum. These values were different (P<0.001) between B. decoloratus on the one hand and R. e.evertsi and A. varigatum on the other hand. However, there was no differences (P>0.05) between R. e. evertsi and A. varigatum. The efficacy of Dieldrin, Diazinon, Chlorefenvinphos and Coumaphos against all test ticks were 74.27 (+ or -) 0.99, 84.72 (+ or -) 0.99, 96.82 (+ or -) 0.99 and 94.98 (+ or -) 0.99, respectively. Dieldrin and Diazinon and Diazinon had higher (P<0.001) killing rates of test ticks than Chlorfenvinphos and Coumaphos. The finding of organophosphate (Diazinon) resistance is the first Report of its kind in the country. It is generally presumed that resistant tick population is emerging at an increasing pace in the area warranting a serious attention. The poor efficacy of Dieldrin and Diazinon may be attributed to the extensive use of chemicals like BHC & Bacdip. Furthermore, their faulty application characterized by irregular spraying, failure to maintain adequate lethal concentrations, reliance on one component of tick control strategy and other managerial constraints could have contributed to the developed resistance problems. It is therefore, high time to revise and consider the existing or other tick control strategies that could best address the alarming resistance problem as well as the managerial constraints hampering the successful use of acaricides.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.isPartOfEthiopian Society of Animal Production Proceedingsen_US
dcterms.issued1998en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherEthiopian Society of Animal Productionen_US
dcterms.subjectholettaen_US
dcterms.subjectcattleen_US
dcterms.subjectmetastigmataen_US
dcterms.subjectacaricidesen_US
dcterms.subjectdrugsen_US
dcterms.subjectresistance to chemicalsen_US
dcterms.subjectspeciesen_US
dcterms.subjectbiological differencesen_US
dcterms.subjectboophilus decoloratusen_US
dcterms.subjectrhipicephalus evertsien_US
dcterms.subjectamblyoma variegatumen_US
dcterms.subjectmortalityen_US
dcterms.typeConference Paperen_US
cg.subject.ilriCATTLEen_US
cg.subject.ilriANIMAL DISEASESen_US
cg.subject.ilriLIVESTOCKen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryEthiopiaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ETen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record