Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNageswara Rao Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorSastry RKen_US
dc.contributor.authorCraufurd, Peter Q.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMeinke Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorParsons, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRego TJen_US
dc.contributor.authorRathore Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-16T06:37:37Zen_US
dc.date.available2014-12-16T06:37:37Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/52159en_US
dc.titleCropping systems strategy for effective management of Fusarium wilt in saffloweren_US
dcterms.abstractIn many parts of India intensive cultivation of safflower on Vertisols appears to have aggravated the problem of Fusarium wilt in safflower due to the soil borne fungus, Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht f. sp. carthami Klisiwiez and Houstan (FOC). In a long-term field experiment at Patancheru, India, we evaluated four diverse dryland cropping systems that each included safflower for their effectiveness in controlling Fusarium wilt in safflower. Sorghum (rainy season crop) and safflower (post-rainy season crop) were grown every alternate year as a two-year rotation with: (1) sorghum intercropped with pigeonpea (S/PP − S + SF); (2) cowpea intercropped with pigeonpea (C/PP − S + SF); (3) sorghum followed by chickpea (S + CP − S + SF); (4) sorghum followed by safflower (S + SF − S + SF). Continuous sorghum and safflower (S + SF − S + SF) had higher Fusarium wilt incidence of fully wilted safflower plants (31%) and a larger build-up of Fusarium propagules (1728 cfu g−1 of soil) than other cropping systems. The inclusion of a legume such as chickpea in the rotation (S + CP − S + SF) reduced wilt incidence (7% fully wilted plants) and the level of inoculum in the soil to about 800 cfu g−1. There was a significant increase in safflower seed yield and biomass yield (883 and 1733 kg ha−1, respectively) in the S + CP − S + SF rotation compared with the S + SF − S + SF rotation (605 and 1323 kg ha−1, respectively). Nitrogen application at rates of 0 to 120 kg N ha−1 had no effect on wilt incidence in safflower, but increased seed and biomass yield significantly. Intercrop rotations (S/PP − S + SF and C/PP − S + SF) were less effective to manage the Fusarium wilt. The Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) was almost 10 times higher in the S + SF − S + SF rotation (2842) compared with the S + CP − S + SF rotation (297). Wilt progress throughout the season in all four systems was linear, with significant differences in intercepts and rates of disease progress among cropping systems; the rate of disease progress was significantly greater in the S + SF − S + SF rotation compared with the other three systems, which were similar. There was also a strong linear relationship between wilt incidence and the number of Fusarium propagules in the soil; regressions had the same slope but different intercepts in each system. There was no relationship between wilt incidence and seed yield; nitrogen had the largest effect on yields. A break from safflower cultivation for one year in the post-rainy season by growing chickpea as a sequential crop after sorghum, or as an intercrop with pigeonpea and sorghum, combined with higher rates of nitrogen application to safflower appears to be an effective strategy for reducing Fusarium populations and sustaining safflower yield.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNageswara Rao V, Sastry RK, Craufurd P, Meinke H, Parsons D, Rego TJ, Rathore A. 2014. Cropping systems strategy for effective management of Fusarium wilt in safflower. Field Crops Research 156, 191-198.en_US
dcterms.extentp. 191-198en_US
dcterms.issued2014-02en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dcterms.subjectclimateen_US
dcterms.subjectagricultureen_US
dcterms.subjectchickpeasen_US
dcterms.subjectcropping systemsen_US
dcterms.subjectfusarium oxysporumen_US
dcterms.subjectsaffloweren_US
dcterms.subjectwiltsen_US
dcterms.subjectdisease managementen_US
dcterms.subjectsorghumen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.subject.ccafsCLIMATE SERVICES AND SAFETY NETSen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.11.013en_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryIndiaen_US
cg.contributor.crpClimate Change, Agriculture and Food Securityen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2INen_US
cg.journalField Crops Researchen_US
cg.issn0378-4290en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record